BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 19 Smack

Season 19 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
208477.149 in reply to 208477.146
Date: 2/27/2012 2:47:14 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
The game vs. me was obviously the better game to put his regular lineup against. But with the effort he hurt his chances in the only game that truly matters? A tough week 3 cup game seems a whole lot more important than 1 of 22 regular season games?

He had the option of HCA + max enthusiasm for this last game and the cup. Plus followed up by at least 2 home games next week. Things were set up real nice. Not that it's all suddenly ruined now, but...

From: shikago

To: red
This Post:
00
208477.152 in reply to 208477.150
Date: 2/27/2012 8:49:14 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
lol, none of this is a big deal. my bad.

Back to the in general 3-2 thing...
Maybe there is an effect, idk? It's just that according to the manual 3-2 zone only causes weaker ID, & is the slowest paced defense. Actually in the past I used to use 3-2 zone quite often & never noticed any real effect on rebounding. If you want I'll play 3-2 zone our next matchup & we can get a 2nd sample? Provided you run out the same lineup more or less. (no major injuries / revamped rosters)

Last edited by shikago at 2/27/2012 8:50:17 AM

From: shikago

To: red
This Post:
00
208477.154 in reply to 208477.153
Date: 2/27/2012 10:03:21 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
In lower leagues, 3-2 zone was arguably the best defense vs. LI. Certainly was for my team. The only exception was maybe vs. truly dominant inside teams. Quite often I'd 3-2 zone *hoping* for the other team to LI. Yeah, it seems like it should decrease rebounding if 2-3 increases it... But that's where 1-3-1 comes in. Now 1-3-1 really kills your defensive rebounding.



From: shikago

To: red
This Post:
00
208477.155 in reply to 208477.151
Date: 2/27/2012 10:16:08 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Oh & yeah I get what you're saying about regular season wins. You might be right. I can see wanting to secure a home win above all else, when winning out at home keeps you safe.

But personally I think you usually end up with the same # of, if not more wins by staying in the cup longer. Just stream of consciousness here.... Very early exit puts you behind the 8-ball. All-star week will kill your enthusiasm. (if you do manage to keep it high til then). Think of how many games you'll have to play at an enthusiasm disadvantage from here on out. Is normaling at 8 enthusiasm still a sure thing vs a team at 11+? Even as soon as next week... that 1st home game just got slightly harder. (coming off 2 normals in a week).


From: Calum
This Post:
00
208477.158 in reply to 208477.1
Date: 2/27/2012 1:11:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Almost mastered the balancing act:

Typical Weekly Net Income: $ 628

That's just enough to feed by ferocious twinky habit

Last edited by Calum at 2/27/2012 1:12:55 PM

This Post:
11
208477.159 in reply to 208477.157
Date: 2/27/2012 7:44:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
A case in point for the disaster of cup elimination is WW: even if it doesn't cost you wins in the league, it may cost you come playoff time. It's pretty plausible, I think that going out of the cup early costed them a final appearance: I knew that when push came to shove, I'd likely be able to beat them on higher enth that I had accumulated with a longer cup run (this is also how I stole an away win at SB in the final the season before...).


The way the enthusiasm spectrum works is that min. level enthusiasm can't degrade on its own, while max. level enthusiasm degrades incredibly quickly on its own (for example, I had 15 enthusiasm after my last game, but it's now at 11, which may fall to 10 for tomorrow's game). The higher a team advances in the tournament, and the more important the cup games are and difficult the opponents become, the more likely the team will need to choose playoff crunch time -- so, considering that and the fast degradation of high enthusiasm, it's very possible my enthusiasm would've been the same had I made it to the end of the tournament. What's certain is that if I made it that deep, I would've had to intentionally lose league games, so I might not have had HCA, which would've been disastrous for my chances in the playoffs.

What gave your team the advantage over mine was the ~300k team salary difference. A huge team salary difference doesn't always mean the more expensive team has an advantage, but it does if that manager has proven he has great judgment choosing players.

Last edited by Ortho Stice at 2/27/2012 7:49:55 PM

Advertisement