BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Drafting Players

Drafting Players (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
106253.15 in reply to 106253.14
Date: 8/24/2009 10:52:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
For many of you the draft list is available, but the link isnt up yet. If you click on Rules, then Draft, then Edit Draft List, you can see your scouting. This may not be available in all countries yet

This Post:
00
106253.16 in reply to 106253.15
Date: 8/24/2009 11:07:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
USA is always the first country, since it's country number one. I'm in holland, nr 16, and no draft list here yet. So just be patient the list is in process

This Post:
00
106253.17 in reply to 106253.11
Date: 8/24/2009 12:45:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
i think the 3 star player depends on the potential. or whatever the second stat is named that you can scout as well...

If he is not A or A+, I would take a risk and put non scouted players higher on the rankings than the 3 star players with weaker potentials.

I have never seen a half decent players that had 3 stars and average or weak potential in the draft have any decent stats after being drafted...

This Post:
00
106253.18 in reply to 106253.17
Date: 8/24/2009 12:46:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Please show at least one 3star A player, pretty please.

This Post:
00
106253.19 in reply to 106253.17
Date: 8/24/2009 12:58:31 PM
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
A is only for 5 star players. That extra just shows if it is a high 5 star or low 5 star (A+ strong and A- weak).

This Post:
00
106253.20 in reply to 106253.19
Date: 8/24/2009 4:02:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
So... just to have some ideas to set the draft order... might be:
* Players with 1-2 stars are more frequently useless?
* Players with some more stars (3-4) but low potential (1-2) might be the same?
* Would you say that it is better to bet on the players with no information if I have some of these two cases in my draft?

Thanks for the ideas! (my first time drafting, so I have no clue what might be a reasonably decent player)

This Post:
00
106253.21 in reply to 106253.20
Date: 8/24/2009 4:43:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Yes, with the except that 1star players (especially F ones) are great for SC and minute management of real players - cause there is a solid chance they will have salaries around 1k or lower.

This Post:
00
106253.22 in reply to 106253.21
Date: 8/25/2009 1:28:14 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
Regarding the draft and scouting purposes, I've noticed that some players play 20 mins while some play 40 mins in the box score.

Does that mean the players who have played 40 mins are potentially better then the ones who have played 20 mins?

This Post:
00
106253.23 in reply to 106253.22
Date: 8/25/2009 1:29:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i believe that have something to do with the stamina, about the overall quality the balls are the better indicator.

This Post:
00
106253.24 in reply to 106253.23
Date: 8/25/2009 2:08:19 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
OK I don't know who to pick first on my draft list, deciding between two players.
Player1 : 5 Star, Grade A and 4 Potential, but really bad box score 0-8 FG in 20 mins.
player2 : 4 Star, Grade & Potential unknown, but 15-19 FG in 40mins.
Would it be wise to just go for the Grade A player be safe or gamble on Player 2?

This Post:
00
106253.25 in reply to 106253.24
Date: 8/25/2009 3:29:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i personally use the boxscore just as tie breaker betwenn players with the same information.

Advertisement