BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > a good C?

a good C?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
173411.15 in reply to 173411.13
Date: 2/3/2011 11:10:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952

As a Cyprus NT coach i am following several players, and from what i saw the statement is correct. Actually tall players are getting trained slower only on OD/JR


Damn, just when you think you know everything about training...

Well, I guess it's not that hard to train it for inside players. When training PA on one position, you place the C on PG spot in a scrimmage, while in defense you put him guarding a C or PF so he doesn't foul out.

This Post:
00
173411.16 in reply to 173411.15
Date: 2/3/2011 11:40:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
I got surprised too, and i opened a threat about that on the Greek forums some time ago. The responses that i got agreed with me...

This Post:
00
173411.17 in reply to 173411.14
Date: 2/3/2011 11:51:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
Oh i am apologize, i was in hurry when i was writing my post. Thats the correct link: (6895165)

Indeed my player is aggressive but 6,7 per 48 to 5.1 is a really big deference, and that some times means win or lose one close game.. Also somehow you have to explain it right? Aggressiveness is not the answer for everything, rather an excuse. Its just 1 part of the foul problems. Take on your account as an NT coach i have lots of data to backing up my statement.


This Post:
00
173411.18 in reply to 173411.2
Date: 2/3/2011 1:06:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
I'll group the skills in tiers

1. IS, ID, Rebounds
2. SB, PA, JS
3. DV, HA, OD
4. JR

IS, ID and Rebounding are absolutely necessary. SB, Passing and JS give your C more versatility and while not absolutely necessary are still quite beneficial. Driving, Handling and Outside Defense are nice to have, and Jump Range is almost useless for a C.

can we see this 21yos skills? starting training at 21yo is usually not the best idea unless the player is already quite developed.


Obviously you don't have a clue my friend

JR is MUCH more importan than DV and HA,and quite important itself..

I want what all men want...I just want it more.
This Post:
00
173411.19 in reply to 173411.18
Date: 2/3/2011 11:45:42 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
I wouldnt say its more important that handling, not on C

This Post:
00
173411.20 in reply to 173411.19
Date: 2/4/2011 4:07:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
You would be wrong then.

I want what all men want...I just want it more.
From: JamesBond

This Post:
00
173411.22 in reply to 173411.21
Date: 2/4/2011 4:29:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
And if I play only outside tactics,IS can be low and it won't matter..It's a moot point..We are talking about players able to play in every tactic.

I want what all men want...I just want it more.
From: JamesBond

This Post:
00
173411.24 in reply to 173411.23
Date: 2/4/2011 5:31:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Just make a search on the TL for C's with 7-4 JS/JR and then another one for C's with 8-2 or even 9-2..And see their 3pt percentages..

I want what all men want...I just want it more.
This Post:
00
173411.25 in reply to 173411.24
Date: 2/4/2011 5:34:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
and how many 3pointers do they take per game? 1 perhaps, at most 2. But they take many midrange JS attempts. SO while yes, their percentages from the perimeter are nice, they play less of a role than their improved JS.

Advertisement