BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > No "*" for WO in NT games?

No "*" for WO in NT games?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
228764.15 in reply to 228764.14
Date: 10/24/2012 8:31:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
i start my post with the knowledge, that i´m a german user, so maybe i´m biased, but:

in my opinion it´s a real pity, that even the officials here have the opinion, that a highly unsportsmanlike action is even rewarded with a bonus and every user, that has an ethos and doesn´t use a "fact" (again, the rules of the game say a forfeit or walkover is awarded with a *, and to me it wasn´t known before that a walkover is not awarded with a * in national team games and i guess a lot of people didn´t know that till this week, i still think this is just a bug if something isn´t executed like the rules say) which is just unsportsmanlike get punished.

In every sport a behaviour like this would be regarded as an offense to the spirit of the game and would be punished in a real hard way. In my opinion there is no difference between a forfeit here and the same procedure which took place during the olympics in london in the badminton contest. If there isn´t any rule in the bb rules, that a behavior that is highly unsportsmanlike and against the spirit of a sports competition (meaning like the olympic oath) then i suggest to implement something like this as soon as possible.

If a behavior like a forfeit is regarded as a good managment (as B.B.King said in a previous post) then something is totally wrong in this game. I don´t know if both teams played a tie but i guess it´s most likely here, and if it´s the case, then there definetely was a deal before between england and hong kong, that england would forfeit the game (why would hong kong play a tie in a game they simply had to win to reach the next round?). Does this sound to anyone like a good thing? There is a big difference in having a deal to tie a game or to not even play a game.

I understand the opinion to say we can´t change the rules in a season. But this is no change of a rule in midseason. I quote the rules:
"
Standings



"I don't want to shoot my mouth in my foot, but those are games we can win."


The Standings is the go-to page for your current division. Here, you can see the relative rankings of each team in the division. We advise you to check the standings page after every game to keep track of your opponents. Teams that are still in the National Tournament will have a small trophy icon next to their name.

When the 22 league games are concluded, the four top-ranked teams in each conference will make it to the playoff round. The playoff schedule is displayed on the standings page; if the regular season has not finished yet, the playoff schedule is predicted according to the current standings. As the season progresses, certain players will perform magnificently on the court. The standings page keeps a list of the league leaders in average points-per-game, rebounds-per-game, and assists-per-game. Clicking on any player will take you to that player's historical box score statistics, broken down by game and by season totals.

Ties in the standings are broken first by number of forfeits (indicated by a * next to the number of losses a team has), followed by point differential, then points scored.

At the end of a season, a most valuable player (MVP) will be selected from all of the players in the division. The results and summary of this selection process will be accessible for all previous seasons. The overall league leaders and the MVP will be given a trophy on the players page. Using the drop-down menu near the top of the page, you can view the final standings for the current division from previous seasons.".

So the rules say there must be a *for a forfeit, why aren´t the rules executed then? Because a "well known fact" (by the way, how do you know that, because two people said it here?And how should another manager know this fact, when he can read in the rules that a forfeit will result in a * ? ) prevents you from executing your own rules? Sorry, there is no logic in that.

This is just fixing the execution of a rule, which was´nt ex

This Post:
00
228764.16 in reply to 228764.15
Date: 10/24/2012 8:32:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
This is just fixing the execution of a rule, which wasn´t executed properly. In my opinion this is a sad sad day for bb.
(And interesting to know for me, that the bb never would have punished the badminton players during the olympics)

This Post:
00
228764.17 in reply to 228764.16
Date: 10/24/2012 10:25:02 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
A lot of things bother me with your post which I'm not going to get into now because I don't want to repeat myself or get dragged into a long discussion.

While you're entitled to your opinion it is not allowed to voice your dissatisfaction over our policy and/or decisions in a fashion that leads to a long discussion in this manner. The issue has already been decided and explained. We will not change our mind and the decision is final and stands as it is.

This is the bugs forum and I will not allow any more post of the same or similar tone and length, so everyone, please consider this a warning and please read the forum rules (205072.1) before posting any further.

This Post:
00
228764.18 in reply to 228764.17
Date: 10/24/2012 11:31:02 AM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72437243
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
but you can expect some changes starting next season. Changes that will fix or render the loophole worthless to use.

that's a start. i hope that with the start of next season, this whole matter finds an end. i didn't know that there is no "*" punishment on the U21/NT level. so ist' somewhere my mistake. i thought that it's the same like in the league. would be nice if you BBs could solve this bug and announce it at the end of this season.

This Post:
00
228764.19 in reply to 228764.14
Date: 10/24/2012 12:02:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
For me it is obvious. Lex retro non agit.

This Post:
00
228764.20 in reply to 228764.15
Date: 10/24/2012 12:16:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
and to me it wasn´t known before that a walkover is not awarded with a * in national team games

We can't punish other managers only because You (or any other manager) don't know how forfeits work in NT/U21 games.
We have better and worse managers in this game. If one NT/U21 manager put some effort to recognize how forfeits work in NT games and other NT/U21 manager didn't, for me first manager is better.
In this game we have many things which aren't described in rules, for example that Patient works like Isolation.
Of course this loophole with forfeits in NT/U21 should be fixed before starting of competitions in next season.

This Post:
99
228764.21 in reply to 228764.20
Date: 10/24/2012 8:59:17 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
This was a bug. The manager exploited the use of a well-known bug, as have others in the past. This isn't like knowing what SB does/does not do because you haven't experimented with it before. Knowing a bug exists (and not reporting it) does not make you a better manager.
My only concern is that this sets a precedent, and managers will have an expectation that future bugs will not be handled retroactively; thereby incentivizing the exploitation of bugs instead of reporting it.

This Post:
00
228764.22 in reply to 228764.21
Date: 10/25/2012 7:59:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
Please note that in past * didn't exist even in league and it wasn't bug, it was reality. And few seasons ago stars for WO were implemented in league and weren't implemented in NT games. It isn't only difference between club and NT competitions. So maybe there is only bug in manaual and sentence "stars exist only in league tables, not in NT tables" aren't added to manual?
I don't remember announcement in which stars were announced. Maybe there was information that stars will be implemented only in league?
It is possible.
Rule "We see that it works in this way for many seasons, to be sure I checked it" is more powerful than rule "I think it should work in this way but I didn't check it".
So we can't change rules after competition starts, even if it's unwritten rule.

This Post:
00
228764.23 in reply to 228764.22
Date: 10/25/2012 8:45:13 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
I'm not overly happy with the current solution, nor would I be if we decided to fix the damn thing. It's a lose-lose situation so we had to choose the lesser evil.
Let's just try not to dwell on it and I'll make sure to fix it starting next season.

This Post:
00
228764.24 in reply to 228764.23
Date: 10/25/2012 8:54:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
It looks like there doesn't exist better motivation to fix loophole than exploitation of this loophole ;-)

This Post:
00
228764.25 in reply to 228764.14
Date: 10/25/2012 2:24:23 PM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83078307
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
I agree, it is a loophole, but a well known one, that NT managers are well aware of. To fix it now and change the standings would mean a big change in the game environment that would affect all the decisions made by the NT managers. I stand by my decision; there will be no changes in the standings but you can expect some changes starting next season. Changes that will fix or render the loophole worthless to use.


I'm sorry that I'll ignore your warning about discussing this issue any further. And please ban me or throw me out of BB for all I care. It's nothing against your work - I appreciate it a great deal that you're so present here in the forums. But it is just not true that NT managers were aware of this loophole. I have been quite active during my 4 seasons as a U21-Manager and I've never stumbled across this issue in the forums. And in all the competitions that I took part in with the U21 a forfeit was never an issue for me. Especially not since in my opinion every NT should field some players in competitions - but that's besides the point. As Fresh24 pointed out, it was the exploiting of a bug. Which should be punised in my opinion. The only "fair" solution in my opinion would be to let neither Germany U21 nor England U21 advance to the next round and letting Bulgaria have a "free" game. Otherwise it seems to me that England is awarded for exploiting a bug. And I agree with Fresh24 that I would - given this precedent - think twice about reporting a bug that would otherwise help me.

This whole situation makes me very angry - and it's not any more about Germany U21 advancing to the next round but as a principle.

And finally @B.B.King: I play the game since season 11 and I don't remember not seeing any "*" in the standings. You play the game longer than I do - but for me the * have always been a reality. So why should I assume that this is not the case in the U21?

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
Advertisement