BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Player Salary Calculator

Player Salary Calculator

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
229677.15 in reply to 229677.8
Date: 11/12/2012 7:42:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
I think you will find that it will be closer to Polish online
but still a few thousand higher than that one
The s17 and Coach Parrot are outdated and several thousand too high constantly


I prefer seeing 10 k higher estimate then 20 k lower. Next season when salaries update you'd be glad S17 and CP gave higher estimate. You believe Polish calculator, that's fine. That's your choice. But how about it gives you estimation of 80k and salary update gets you to 100-110k. I'd be angry :)

From: w_alloy
This Post:
00
229677.16 in reply to 229677.15
Date: 11/12/2012 4:10:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I juse the S17 calculator and adjust down ~10%, seems to work pretty well.

This Post:
00
229677.17 in reply to 229677.15
Date: 11/12/2012 6:26:02 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
716716
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
The thing is, it's the one that's closest to accurate
It wouldn't be 20-30 K off for crying out loud
way to go with an unbelievable example to make a silly point
from my experience it's only off by a couple of thousand
while the others are off by plenty
so believe what you will, I'll believe the truth

This Post:
00
229677.18 in reply to 229677.17
Date: 11/12/2012 7:49:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
The thing is, it's the one that's closest to accurate
It wouldn't be 20-30 K off for crying out loud
way to go with an unbelievable example to make a silly point
from my experience it's only off by a couple of thousand
while the others are off by plenty
so believe what you will, I'll believe the truth

Chill out man. I put ":)" which means - take it lightly.
Plus, you don't know the truth (that Polish calculator is accurate). No one does. But I'll be happier when salaries update. :)))

Let's agree to disagree, hehe.

This Post:
00
229677.20 in reply to 229677.18
Date: 11/12/2012 8:34:37 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
716716
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Fine by me
I'm just saying as I check out all the calculators
that's how they add up
best of luck

This Post:
00
229677.22 in reply to 229677.21
Date: 11/12/2012 9:31:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12661266
They are based on stats. If you think it is not good enough then I am sure everyone would be pleased if you made a new better one.

This Post:
00
229677.23 in reply to 229677.22
Date: 11/12/2012 10:02:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
They are based on stats.

Really? I thought they were based on eggplants.

But agreed, there should be a range for salary estimators.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
From: ibarix

This Post:
00
229677.24 in reply to 229677.19
Date: 11/13/2012 6:40:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Why don't we just test it on guys who didn't have any skill changes throughout the season?

Even then it won't be accurate because skills have sublevels. Someone already gave example - rebounding 12.1 and 12.9 and different salary.