BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Profit on selling players

Profit on selling players

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
230361.15 in reply to 230361.14
Date: 11/24/2012 3:26:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
I'm very relaxed, thank you.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
230361.16 in reply to 230361.13
Date: 11/24/2012 3:27:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
That's like me saying "Hey I trained my 18 y/r draftee to a 21 y/o starting PG for nothing." Or like for nothing.

You didn't pay for them so it's free. Both you and me will pay salaries, trainers etc. so that's irrelevant. That's a constant. What is a variable is how much money you get and spend. At the end of the season you'll have good young draftee and I'll have 600k from selling. I can sign a player for those 600k and I'll get better player then your trainee. So it's kind of a free upgrade if you like. Don't you think?

But what I am quoting is off.

I didn't say it's free. The topic is complex. Too many factors you don't think of and you're quoting one sentence taken from the context so it kind of tired me. :)

PS don't be a troll, read posts if you like and understand them however you like, I'm done with answering you in this post

cheers

From: LooKA

This Post:
00
230361.17 in reply to 230361.16
Date: 11/24/2012 9:47:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
why even bother fighting with people like that guy?
ignore and go on ;)

From: Jay_m

This Post:
11
230361.18 in reply to 230361.14
Date: 11/24/2012 10:35:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
you`re being too picky and splitting hairs, relax. I don`t count my trainers salary in terms of offlaying it against any money I make on selling my trainees. Is it really necessary to be so facetious? The guy answered my questions perfectly.


It is not really a facetious question. If you were not training at all you would spend 2k x 10 weeks (I think that's the minimum salary), so there is a real cost of say $15k per week for 10 weeks or 150k. if you're training anyway, you can ignore the cost but if you are training purely for profit you have to consider the full cost.

From: Scipio

This Post:
00
230361.19 in reply to 230361.18
Date: 11/25/2012 4:40:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
Thanks,

I have always trained players. Three of my five starters are players I have trained (front court) and some of my bench are players I have trained. I now need to make some money form doing it.

Cheers.

From: Jay_m

This Post:
00
230361.20 in reply to 230361.19
Date: 11/25/2012 5:04:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
Sure, I agree with you. I was just pointing out that there is a cost attached.

From: Scipio

This Post:
00
230361.21 in reply to 230361.20
Date: 11/25/2012 5:33:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
Cool, thanks for the input.

This Post:
33
230361.22 in reply to 230361.20
Date: 11/25/2012 5:35:54 AM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
719719
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Yes there is the cost of training
but there is another side to training that reduces the cost
the player you have is always under-valued
the better a trained player gets, obviously the better he performs
but his salary doesn't go up until after the season
so you might end up with a $10,000 player playing like a $30,000 player
one you won't have to buy at playoff time
you'll already have him

From: ibarix

This Post:
00
230361.23 in reply to 230361.17
Date: 11/25/2012 7:50:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
why even bother fighting with people like that guy?
ignore and go on ;)

Hehe.