BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Same skill lvl, better decimals?

Same skill lvl, better decimals?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
302570.15 in reply to 302570.14
Date: 2/29/2020 3:52:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Nice one.

This Post:
11
302570.17 in reply to 302570.16
Date: 3/1/2020 12:47:50 AM
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
334334
You're right. It can't prove that it is not sorted by sub-level.
If player I's best position change from SG to PF or C, then it will prove something. But I think it is difficult for player I.

Last edited by little Guest at 3/1/2020 12:49:37 AM

This Post:
00
302570.18 in reply to 302570.16
Date: 3/1/2020 10:37:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
His theory is very easy to disprove if incorrect. People can simply check before arguing and if you see a C before a PG then you will know for sure that is not how they are sorted.

In any case that is only the second sorting mechanism, even if correct, it only moves the goalposts to the next sorting mechanism (i.e. how are PGs with the same skill level sorted?) until there is one that is definitely unique for each player (like player ID or indeed skill level with sublevels).

Last edited by Lemonshine at 3/1/2020 10:40:58 AM

This Post:
11
302570.19 in reply to 302570.17
Date: 4/3/2020 5:25:04 AM
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
334334
On 2020/03/02, I bought player J and K as the reference. They have never been trained. The following is the order sorted by a skill on 2020/03/05.
--------------------------
player D, 29 y.o., PG
player I, 21 y.o., SG
player J, 18 y.o., SG
player K, 18 y.o., SG
player E, 33 y.o., SF
player F, 41 y.o., SF
player G, 39 y.o., PF
--------------------------
Today (2020/04/03), the best position of player I changes from SG to PF. The following is the order.
--------------------------
player D, 29 y.o., PG
player J, 18 y.o., SG
player K, 18 y.o., SG
player E, 33 y.o., SF
player F, 41 y.o., SF
player G, 39 y.o., PF
player I, 21 y.o., PF
--------------------------
It implies that it is not sorted by sub-level.