BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BB Economics...

BB Economics...

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
69634.15 in reply to 69634.12
Date: 1/22/2009 5:33:58 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
777777
for example a 10% of palace incomes with palace between 10000 and 15000 - 15% of palace incomes with palace between 15000 and 20000 - 20% with palace between 20000 and 25000 - 25% with palace over 25000
This could be a good idea...


exactly.


i play in III and i expanded my arena to 10000 (spending some money in the process)
i keep low prices and i can't fill it because i'm winning about 50% of my matches
why should i be taxed more than my opponents?

the real problem with BB-economy is that there are dozens of countries who are so small their economy is completely unbalanced. that should be fixed

This Post:
00
69634.17 in reply to 69634.16
Date: 1/22/2009 6:20:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I think he means that one team dominates the league, so that he gets all the money?

Wild guess.

This Post:
00
69634.18 in reply to 69634.17
Date: 1/22/2009 6:36:27 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
777777
I think he means that one team dominates the league, so that he gets all the money?

Wild guess.


of course

This Post:
00
69634.19 in reply to 69634.17
Date: 1/22/2009 6:39:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I think he means that one team dominates the league, so that he gets all the money?

Wild guess.


Hey Ricey hows it going?
In my league the team below now must net $300-$325k a week more than me. So how many week will it take him with todays Transfer market prices to build a team worthy of challenging?!


This Post:
00
69634.20 in reply to 69634.15
Date: 1/22/2009 6:46:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Agreed. Some revenue modifier, even small, to adjust for the massive difference in competition between countries would be nice. Though i doubt it'll ever happen.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: jbmcrock

This Post:
00
69634.21 in reply to 69634.20
Date: 1/22/2009 6:48:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Agreed. Some revenue modifier, even small, to adjust for the massive difference in competition between countries would be nice. Though i doubt it'll ever happen.

I thought that was already present with attendance based somewhat (admittedly lightly) on the visiting teams sth's.

This Post:
00
69634.22 in reply to 69634.20
Date: 1/22/2009 6:59:50 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
777777
Agreed. Some revenue modifier, even small, to adjust for the massive difference in competition between countries would be nice. Though i doubt it'll ever happen.


i don't have the solution but the problem is clearly there and it's going to make someone unhappy anyway it's dealt with (or even keeping it as it is)
maybe a country should've been given their own league only after reaching a critical mass of users to provide enough competition in all the I series, therefore making them more balanced

From: brian

This Post:
00
69634.23 in reply to 69634.21
Date: 1/22/2009 7:35:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Isn't that more to do with how long teams have been around, rather then how strong the teams are in each division?

The Canadian league has been around since season 1, just like the usa has. Though there's a difference in the strength of the leagues, not sure why there'd be any difference in STH's.


"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
69634.24 in reply to 69634.22
Date: 1/22/2009 7:40:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Agreed, it does go both ways. Serie A is stronger then the NBBA (what, ive never said otherwise! It costs more to survive there so I'd support them having a slight increased revenue stream, same for the lower divisions. With twice as many users, it costs more to compete in Italy at every level then it does in the US. Why should't there be an adjustment based on the number of users to balance the economic playing field?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
69634.25 in reply to 69634.24
Date: 1/22/2009 9:32:03 PM
Talentinho
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
481481
Second Team:
De Grote Spelers
As stated in another topic why should one country have an increase because there are more users? It has been discussed multiple times. Far too often topics like these end up in people pleading for changes that benefit themselves. If one country would get an increase in economy, all users would end up there. And since the world doesn't only consist out of 4 countries we should keep it this way.

Advertisement