I respect your opinion. I felt like you deserved an answer. There it is. I sincerely hope not to participate in this t
Sorry to make you run out of letters, but thanks anyway. I respect yours. Indeed I'm not lacking disrespect for Perpete either though he might be surprised to see that. Or Manon who took the time to bbmail me today.
Perpete, and to a lesser extent you, perhaps take the brunt of the criticism simply because no one else seems interested. I know I have singled out Perpete earlier in the thread, and perhaps that seems to imply that I might have something personal against him, but that is not the case.
There are two parts to his response. If you're not cheating, it doesn't mean you can discuss moderation, just like if it's not a moderation discussion, it doesn't make talking about cheating okay.
Not only am I not cheating, I'm not talking about cheating. Though again, I'd like to see a change to the manual so that it is clear that even people who have been banned for cheating get a reply telling them their appeal has been rejected.
But when the assertion is made that the rule doesn't even exist? Yes, that is absolutely the time to quote the rule.
Agreed, and I apologise. I should have worded my response (which deliberately wasn't a reply to you) to make it clear that the above was a general reference and not meant as a reply to you.