SBCT was missing a guard to injury. My starting center (played pf for defensive purposes in case santos slid over to PF) went down with an injury after playing 12 mins. He plays look inside and his best player was held to half the total points he normally scores while his team was out rebounded on a 2:1 margin. I also was +17 when comparing offensive rebounds. How much do you really think that SG effected that rebounding edge and eventual outcome?
For offense and defense, which injury was more costly, his starting SG who was injured ahead of time allowing him the ability to game plan, or my starting C who was injured in the 1st quarter allowing the match engine to work with the sub pattern I set at the beginning of the game? Also note that my starting C that was injured is me best inside defender who I was hoping would help slow down our national team player....
Take off your tinted glasses and enjoy the view reality presents.
Did you also notice in tonight's match, that the second leading scorer came to my house and he was also held to less then half his scoring average? Who was it again who was railing on and on about offense while mocking me when I mentioned that defense was important as well?
The current make up of my team is taking into account remaining in the cup. I am profitable every week without the cup revenue. After I exit the cup, like most teams, a few changes will be made regarding back-ups.