BuzzerBeater Forums

You're absolutly right about the rules:

Having your player on a national team will not affect his player ratings or weekly minutes in any way. However, he will be susceptible to injury, and you will not be able to fire him.

But if you have proof please post in the thread mentioned in the previous post: we are dying for some evidence :)

I am already wrote my opinion in this issue ..
I think it's need to be age 18-20 .. in the future maybe make it 18-21 .. (let the game and the NTs grow.. all the players in the NTs now are not so older... age 20-21 ..)

they also can add a young players to the draft something like age 17 more few seasons .. and then will have possible to construct a junior NTs for the long term ...

But if you have proof please post in the thread mentioned in the previous post: we are dying for some evidence

The definitive answers are in that post.

No they are not! We need proof!! ;-)

I read all the italian discussion of the new BB changes for the season 6 http://www.buzzerbeater.org/BBWeb/Forum/read.aspx?thread=..., I noted something on microsoft word but then my computer was turned off and I lost everything ....

patience

however:

I am in a small Italian serie, then I don't feel totally involved in the changes

I believe micio82, and my opinion is that he isn’t wrong to say that we need to increase the palace

Now the 40%, in the major leagues, of the money got from the palace will be divided between the players, and the only way to get back that money will be the same palace

if we didn’t have the desire and the time to increase the palace before the changes, because after 10 victories and 1 defeat the public decreased, now the air is changed.

we don’t know if these changes will last several seasons, but at least in these 2 months and a half viewers will be more regular, and if one must already give 40% of the revenues I don't know where it should go to resume this money ...

we take the example of a 14k places palace from one of 8k:

before the changes having 6500 spectators who have paid $ 50 was equal to have 5000 that have paid $ 65

that coach with the big palace had spent a lot of money but basically had no substantial advantages. and this was the thought of all.

but now that the turnout will be more realistic the guy with the 14k palace will have 8, 9, 10, 11k spectators, and may also decide on his pleasure the prices

while that with only 8k posts will be penalised, and if he too will increase prices to recover the money, he will danger of having one month with 8 games with few supporters and lose a lot of dollars.

because we haven’t taken account of this: if we increase prices too much and people don’t come to see our matches will have to pass a month, almost half championship, to lower prices.

then I begin to take precautions, perhaps increasing a thousand seats capacity of the palace with the money arrived from the draft, quite promising, and maybe with some player who will have to leave.

the second thing:

the BB have to control the users who register in country where there are only ten teams.
Is not possible that those coaches earn the same money a player of Italian serie A.

it is as the Italian way of not paying taxes: some Italian vips results inhabitants of Barbados or Belize, and so the don’t pay Italian taxes.

for me is right a salary cap series by series, which increases or decreases based on team’s victories or other things.

last thing: I agree with those users who say you change BB to make it more balanced (or rather, less unbalanced), because people who register don’t want to start with a team in the shit up to neck, in most cases sentenced to downgrade, with only 1 good player.

if a guy register to BB and see that his team has a record of 1-10 leaves everything without even take a turn at the site.

if not how do we explain the total lack of new subscriptions to BB?

we are 26k.

indeed, 2 seasons ago we were a few more.

best regards, sorry for the Italian english

well don't forget to a falling stamina on HT and the point that you have to increase stamina-share there (another "great" implementation which holds down continusely an training of a new teams which have to play a pressing)

I know what you mean about holding water, but I wanted to say that the technical skills aren't falling in real so early, player doesn't lose his brain in 32y, maybe only speed of reactions or physical abilities.. however I wanted to say that it is not that simple as losing a skills if you are older - it depends on the kind of skills and in fact boosting of this player by XP, while the levels of XP have NOT a linear affect (in real)

And likewise in HT you lose skills differentially with age: some skills are easier to drop than others. Also, despite the fact that his skills have started to drop, a 32-year-old can still be a great player in HT. 'Not losing his brain' is also exactly reflected by accumulated experience which is not dropping.

I understand where you're coming from, but I think the overall structure is a pretty good approximation.

Oh, and I thought continuous stamina training was great -- now I don't have to bother about changing my training to accommodate for stamina.

And likewise in HT you lose skills differentially with age: some skills are easier to drop than others. Also, despite the fact that his skills have started to drop, a 32-year-old can still be a great player in HT. 'Not losing his brain' is also exactly reflected by accumulated experience which is not dropping.

I knew it!! My coach IS losing his mind: he is steadlily losing experience... :)

And likewise in HT you lose skills differentially with age: some skills are easier to drop than others. Also, despite the fact that his skills have started to drop, a 32-year-old can still be a great player in HT. 'Not losing his brain' is also exactly reflected by accumulated experience which is not dropping.

I knew it!! My coach IS losing his mind: he is steadlily losing experience...

That'd be leadership (or coaching skill), not experience. Plus he didn't have any mind to begin with to take a coaching position there

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 7/31/2008 10:12:30 AM

Absolutly right in both cases :p But the money was just to good for him to refuse...
But anyway, back to the topic!

Oh, and I thought continuous stamina training was great -- now I don't have to bother about changing my training to accommodate for stamina.

do you think so? Make from teams a farms for NTs with 5 percent share stamina? Another disadvantage, Bleah?:)

No they are not! We need proof!! ;-)

NT injuries cannot be longer than the game in which the injury was suffered.

This is a confirmed fact.