BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Stop robbing managers

Stop robbing managers

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
53381.158 in reply to 53381.157
Date: 11/27/2008 10:32:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
50k would be a little extreme. If a manager decides that he wants to pay 50k a week to one of his staff, I say we let him.

Or if we don't go with the weekly increase if salary, we can go for the two season staff lock. Staff is paid a set amount which does not increase and is obligated to serve your club for two seasons. After two seasons, other clubs can 'see' your staff and his salary. If they think he is suitable, they can offer him a higher salary. You have 3 days to offer him a better salary before he leaves for the new team.

That way we don't have to worry about people keeping low paid staff for 10 seasons or so. And it puts the onus on the clubs to actively scout and pinch these low wage earners.

This Post:
00
53381.159 in reply to 53381.158
Date: 11/27/2008 10:49:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
On coaches with speciality and with level 5, 6, 7 - I would not see 50k wage as an extreme - without other investments.

You can imagine that if you want to erase momentally investment during bidding which is on current system (600k-2,2M), these money have to be spent by other way and this other way is on your suggestion a wage...

..this can create great demand from lower leagues, because they will be now capable to bid on that too, that means even stronger wage bidwar...

In this context is current system genious, in my opinion

This Post:
00
53381.161 in reply to 53381.160
Date: 11/27/2008 11:42:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
allowing teams to arbitrarily profit by good deals over time with no built-in mechanisms to prevent this


You are talking like a cop.