BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 15 Smack

Season 15 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
From: wozzvt

To: Coco
This Post:
00
168799.159 in reply to 168799.149
Date: 2/6/2011 2:29:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
This only blocks deflation on elite player. It doesn't affect deflation on Anczarski types.

[global user mode on]
We don't care about the .00001 % of the BB population that plays in B3. We want to be able to see the results of our training reflected in our sales prices.
[global user mode off]

Not to beat a dead horse, but I agree it won't affect Anczarski types. The difference is I don't think it should. Anczarski shouldn't be an elite player with those skills (well, he's not anyway, but he shouldn't even be as close as he is)... hell, we have 22yo's with better skills than that. I actually think the prices he's getting are about right, the issue is that there should be many significantly better *and* more desirable players than him out there. There aren't many because top end players become less valuable since their salaries are generally unrealistic and unsustainable.

Anyway, almost pulled that off vs Ice. Oh well... rough week for my mountain goats.

From: wozzvt

This Post:
11
168799.160 in reply to 168799.159
Date: 2/6/2011 2:39:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Here's another way to look at my main problem... Imagine plotting "player performance" on that x-axis of a graph with "player value" on the y-axis. This could be bb-rating and TL price, but doesn't have to be. And for simplicity, let's imagine it only for centers. So, what does the graph look like? I think (without having actually done it, but based on lots of evidence), it's an inverted-U. That means that at some point, making a player better makes him less valuable. I challenge you (I'm not sure who I'm arguing with, so "you" here means the person I'm imagining angrily shaking my fist at) to find any league in any sport in any country that would have an inverted-U shaped plot here. Every sport I can think of or imagine has a monotonically increasing trend (linear, non-linear, whatever, but never with value decreasing as ability increases).

From: Edju
This Post:
00
168799.162 in reply to 168799.161
Date: 2/7/2011 11:31:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
1-6 and a positive PD.

Go me.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: Edju
This Post:
00
168799.163 in reply to 168799.161
Date: 2/7/2011 11:31:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
1-6 and a positive PD.

Go me.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: cruzanm423

To: Edju
This Post:
00
168799.164 in reply to 168799.163
Date: 2/7/2011 3:06:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Welcome back to the suffer fest that is the NBBA.

Accept that some days you are the pigeon and some days you are the statue. Dilbert
From: jfarb
This Post:
00
168799.167 in reply to 168799.166
Date: 2/8/2011 10:07:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
3 OTs for me this week, and two 2pt losses. Yay.

From: stogey23

To: Coco
This Post:
00
168799.168 in reply to 168799.166
Date: 2/8/2011 11:24:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
Blanking the lineup, eh? All the latest technology...

In other news, I have no idea why my game was as close as it turned out to be, given the ratings.

I've been doing that for over a season now. I think it actually cost me against you last year, because my best defenders didn't play the most minutes.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
From: stogey23

This Post:
00
168799.169 in reply to 168799.159
Date: 2/8/2011 11:29:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
What's up with the rebounding ratings?

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
Advertisement