BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New Draft System / Potential

New Draft System / Potential

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
24882.160 in reply to 24882.147
Date: 4/21/2008 1:01:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Last season I invested less, had less info and got 2 very good and one sellable draftee with 8th pick in my league.

This season I invested 20k all season and I can see 32 players, 10 of them with full info, more than half of them with 4 and 5 star ratings, 4 of them with 2 stars and 1 of them with 1 star. My idiot scout invited all the visible 1 and 2 star players in for private sessions. Sound thinking - why bother with the good ones let's see if these guys have any water-bottle-and-towel carrying potential.

With 14th pick I guess my +250k are wasted as my chances of getting a good draftee are close to what I'd have with no investment whatsoever = random, therefore it's either the full 40k or nothing if you plan to be among the top teams in your league.

In a way that's fair - top teams need to be hindered to some extent - but what if you're at the bottom of your league? Can you afford the 20k investment that would suffice for at least one good pick?





Last edited by GM-Tanuki at 4/21/2008 1:01:40 PM

This Post:
00
24882.161 in reply to 24882.147
Date: 4/21/2008 1:10:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
That was my first thought too, but then of course the scout might have thought that he was 4* or 5* before he had him playing a training session, and after this training session the star rating has been updated. This would suggest that the star ratings alone are very unreliable.

However, I do not believe that this is the case, but it is a possibility.

This Post:
00
24882.163 in reply to 24882.162
Date: 4/21/2008 1:25:06 PM
AS Barroom Heroes
III.13
Overall Posts Rated:
10341034
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
I absolutely agree. I am convinced it's always the best solution to pick the best player available.
Drafting an A+ player and then not training him would be a tremendously bad idea.

This Post:
00
24882.165 in reply to 24882.164
Date: 4/21/2008 1:34:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
top 10 players on the board, 8 centers and 2 point guards. does bb really need that many high picked centers?

This Post:
00
24882.166 in reply to 24882.164
Date: 4/21/2008 1:39:03 PM
AS Barroom Heroes
III.13
Overall Posts Rated:
10341034
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
In my case it seems to be a trend...
Out of 48 players, I scouted 27 at least once, 11 of which are 5-star guys, plus a 4-star guy with 5-star potential.

This Post:
00
24882.167 in reply to 24882.158
Date: 4/21/2008 1:40:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
How active is your league? I made some stats from my league last draft and it showed that almost everyone got their first pick in the first round. Worst case scenario was only getting our second pick, and I actually think that only happened to two teams.


It's a good league, with good managers and good competition. Out of 16 teams, three are going bot very soon and one other looks abandoned. The other 12 are all attentive.

Last season, I got my 2nd and 3rd choices with the 15th pick. I'm not worried too much with regard to what I get. With the guaranteed 5* player in round 1, I've got a good chance at getting a talented 4* in round 2, and there are some nice guard prospects in the mix.

This Post:
00
24882.168 in reply to 24882.163
Date: 4/21/2008 1:40:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I absolutely agree. I am convinced it's always the best solution to pick the best player available.
Drafting an A+ player and then not training him would be a tremendously bad idea.


What you're saying doesn't make sense to me!?
1 : Always draft best player available(no matter at what position).
2 : Drafting an A+ player and not training would be a bad idea.

Doesn't (2) mean that it's better to draft a B+ and train him, than drafting an A+and not train him?
Or does your training depend on your draft?

From: Unkel
This Post:
00
24882.169 in reply to 24882.126
Date: 4/21/2008 1:43:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Power Forwards in the draft?

Are there anyone that has a Power Forward on the list. I have none of 29.
My father has none of 27.
That is a very low % PF.

This Post:
00
24882.170 in reply to 24882.161
Date: 4/21/2008 1:45:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
That was my first thought too, but then of course the scout might have thought that he was 4* or 5* before he had him playing a training session, and after this training session the star rating has been updated. This would suggest that the star ratings alone are very unreliable.

However, I do not believe that this is the case, but it is a possibility.

that sounds interesting. i mean, it makes sense, doesn't it. so, star ratings without second scouting, not so reliable. with second scouting, you get the 'exact' star rating with an additional trend given by the grade rating (+-). an interesting point of view.

Advertisement