BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Testing the "empty lineup prevention" code in Private League matches

Testing the "empty lineup prevention" code in Private League matches

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
259887.160 in reply to 259887.159
Date: 10/18/2014 7:18:22 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36183618
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Well that's very good news! Looks like it worked perfectly in your case. Let's see some more reports and then change the testing parameters. Next week, please use a full depth chart and LCD, with the same players set as they were set this week by the new code.

This Post:
00
259887.162 in reply to 259887.161
Date: 10/19/2014 10:46:14 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36183618
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
No, that's fine. Hope your injuries are short and you have a good doctor.

This Post:
00
259887.163 in reply to 259887.162
Date: 10/23/2014 4:09:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
(75286033) LCD, blank lineup, let them play

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG G. Sutherland
SG B. Penkov
SF S. MacKechnie
PF G. Marasco
C P. Buchwald

minutes played:
PF G. Marasco 31
SF S. MacKechnie 30
PG G. Sutherland 34
C P. Buchwald 26
SF I. Nikifarau 18
PF S. Moffett 17
SG B. Penkov 30
C G. Walsh 22
SG J. Zozaya 18
PG J. Doughty 14
dnp R. Bollert
dnp V. Skoropad

The game was a blowout win. The chosen players were a good choice. Only the player selected as SG surprised me but I think I didn't have a good alternative.

-----------

(78440041) LCD, blank lineup, let them play

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG R. Geugelin
SG H. Brockmann
SF G. Quellmelz
PF T. Harjans
C T. Nürnberg

minutes played:
PG R. Geugelin 46
PF T. Harjans 48
SF G. Quellmelz 29
C T. Nürnberg 39
SG H. Brockmann 35
PG R. Krispl 2
SF J. Sedelmayer 19
SG A. Stoebner 13
C F. Wildenhain 9
dnp S. Berner
dnp N. Rauch-Höphffner
dnp J. Friz

The game was a blowout loss. That's why most of my starters played a lot of minutes.

These two games looked good!

This Post:
00
259887.164 in reply to 259887.160
Date: 10/24/2014 5:06:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
Well that's very good news! Looks like it worked perfectly in your case. Let's see some more reports and then change the testing parameters. Next week, please use a full depth chart and LCD, with the same players set as they were set this week by the new code.

Ok, I did that.

LCD, blank lineup, let them play, (75286037)

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG G. Sutherland
SG B. Penkov
SF S. MacKechnie
PF G. Marasco
C P. Buchwald

lineup set:
PG: Sutherland / Doughty / Doughty
SG: Penkov / Zozaya / Zozaya
SF: MacKechnie / Nikifarau / Nikifarau
PF: Marasco / Moffett / Moffett
C: Buchwald / Walsh / Walsh

minutes played:
PG G. Sutherland 36
C P. Buchwald 28
SG B. Penkov 31
PF G. Marasco 30
SF I. Nikifarau 21
SF S. MacKechnie 27
SG J. Zozaya 17
C G. Walsh 20
PG J. Doughty 12
PF S. Moffett 18
dnp R. Bollert
dnp V. Skoropad

The game was a blowout win.

Comparing the games: same lineup, almost the same minute distribution. Looks good!

-----------

LCD, blank lineup, let them play, (78440048)

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG R. Geugelin
SG H. Brockmann
SF G. Quellmelz
PF T. Harjans
C T. Nürnberg

lineup set:
PG: Geugelin / Geugelin / Krispl
SG: Brockmann / Brockmann / Stoebner
SF: Quellmelz / Quellmelz / Sedelmayer
PF: Harjans / Harjans / Harjans
C: Nürnberg / Nürnberg / Wildenhain

minutes played:
C T. Nürnberg 48
SF G. Quellmelz 48
PG R. Geugelin 48
PF T. Harjans 48
SG H. Brockmann 44
SG A. Stoebner 4
SF R. Krispl 0
dnp J. Sedelmayer
dnp F. Wildenhain
dnp S. Berner
dnp N. Rauch-Höphffner
dnp J. Friz

The game was very tight. So in the end the starters almost played the whole game.

Comparing the games: same lineup, almost no substitutions because of my lack of good bench-players.

This Post:
00
259887.170 in reply to 259887.168
Date: 11/6/2014 8:57:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Just a reminder to all who contribute to this thread, there is a vote underway which seeks to prioritise each of the commonly accepted improvements to the game.

Please join in the discussion at (264729.1)

Advertisement