BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Testing the "empty lineup prevention" code in Private League matches

Testing the "empty lineup prevention" code in Private League matches

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
259887.163 in reply to 259887.162
Date: 10/23/2014 4:09:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
(75286033) LCD, blank lineup, let them play

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG G. Sutherland
SG B. Penkov
SF S. MacKechnie
PF G. Marasco
C P. Buchwald

minutes played:
PF G. Marasco 31
SF S. MacKechnie 30
PG G. Sutherland 34
C P. Buchwald 26
SF I. Nikifarau 18
PF S. Moffett 17
SG B. Penkov 30
C G. Walsh 22
SG J. Zozaya 18
PG J. Doughty 14
dnp R. Bollert
dnp V. Skoropad

The game was a blowout win. The chosen players were a good choice. Only the player selected as SG surprised me but I think I didn't have a good alternative.

-----------

(78440041) LCD, blank lineup, let them play

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG R. Geugelin
SG H. Brockmann
SF G. Quellmelz
PF T. Harjans
C T. Nürnberg

minutes played:
PG R. Geugelin 46
PF T. Harjans 48
SF G. Quellmelz 29
C T. Nürnberg 39
SG H. Brockmann 35
PG R. Krispl 2
SF J. Sedelmayer 19
SG A. Stoebner 13
C F. Wildenhain 9
dnp S. Berner
dnp N. Rauch-Höphffner
dnp J. Friz

The game was a blowout loss. That's why most of my starters played a lot of minutes.

These two games looked good!

This Post:
00
259887.164 in reply to 259887.160
Date: 10/24/2014 5:06:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
Well that's very good news! Looks like it worked perfectly in your case. Let's see some more reports and then change the testing parameters. Next week, please use a full depth chart and LCD, with the same players set as they were set this week by the new code.

Ok, I did that.

LCD, blank lineup, let them play, (75286037)

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG G. Sutherland
SG B. Penkov
SF S. MacKechnie
PF G. Marasco
C P. Buchwald

lineup set:
PG: Sutherland / Doughty / Doughty
SG: Penkov / Zozaya / Zozaya
SF: MacKechnie / Nikifarau / Nikifarau
PF: Marasco / Moffett / Moffett
C: Buchwald / Walsh / Walsh

minutes played:
PG G. Sutherland 36
C P. Buchwald 28
SG B. Penkov 31
PF G. Marasco 30
SF I. Nikifarau 21
SF S. MacKechnie 27
SG J. Zozaya 17
C G. Walsh 20
PG J. Doughty 12
PF S. Moffett 18
dnp R. Bollert
dnp V. Skoropad

The game was a blowout win.

Comparing the games: same lineup, almost the same minute distribution. Looks good!

-----------

LCD, blank lineup, let them play, (78440048)

lineup chosen was like this:
POS Starting-Five
PG R. Geugelin
SG H. Brockmann
SF G. Quellmelz
PF T. Harjans
C T. Nürnberg

lineup set:
PG: Geugelin / Geugelin / Krispl
SG: Brockmann / Brockmann / Stoebner
SF: Quellmelz / Quellmelz / Sedelmayer
PF: Harjans / Harjans / Harjans
C: Nürnberg / Nürnberg / Wildenhain

minutes played:
C T. Nürnberg 48
SF G. Quellmelz 48
PG R. Geugelin 48
PF T. Harjans 48
SG H. Brockmann 44
SG A. Stoebner 4
SF R. Krispl 0
dnp J. Sedelmayer
dnp F. Wildenhain
dnp S. Berner
dnp N. Rauch-Höphffner
dnp J. Friz

The game was very tight. So in the end the starters almost played the whole game.

Comparing the games: same lineup, almost no substitutions because of my lack of good bench-players.

This Post:
00
259887.170 in reply to 259887.168
Date: 11/6/2014 8:57:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Just a reminder to all who contribute to this thread, there is a vote underway which seeks to prioritise each of the commonly accepted improvements to the game.

Please join in the discussion at (264729.1)

This Post:
11
259887.172 in reply to 259887.164
Date: 11/12/2014 7:08:46 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36183618
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Thank you guys for testing and reporting, these reports are great.
While karangula has some very promising results, the brambauti's problem shows that the "feature" is still not ready. However, it is encouraging to see that the code does "kick in" at appropriate times, even if it doesn't really do what it's supposed to successfully. Seems like that is the problem that needs fixing.

It would help to have more testers and more reports, testing only the blank lineups from now on. My everlasting thanks goes to karagula and brambauti for their efforts which puts us one step closer to the implementation of the code.

How big are chances LCD will not exist in this season? It is possible? Or we will play with LCD one season more? Make it clear please. I don't know what to do now. Do something changes or wait.
@kozlik4: It is impossible to predict when it will be implemented, while testing is underway. Depending on the testing results, the decision to implement will be made. I guess what I'm saying is: watch this thread and you'll probably see when it will be done. Also, to help speed up the process, test and report yourself, or even better, get others to do it too.

From: minde

This Post:
00
259887.173 in reply to 259887.172
Date: 11/14/2014 12:09:55 PM
No Good News
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
398398
Second Team:
Backyard Brawlers
It would help to have more testers and more reports, testing only the blank lineups from now on.

I used blank in my PL tonight.. Lost by 2 points.. but its usual..
PG Gagys 48
SG Angel 40 Brimeris 8
SF Urbanovilius 41 Posecnas 7
PF Lyubarov 48
C Maldunas 39 Milieska 9
I think it was ok.. Usually BL selects Gagys to play at sg, and Angel at PG.. Because of the lack of back-up sf in my team Posecnas was used as sf.. For me, he is more like pf, but my sf has comparatively low stamina, so he had to be substituted.. So, for my understanding, everything went fine..

Advertisement