BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training Help, PLZ help!

Training Help, PLZ help!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
140145.17 in reply to 140145.15
Date: 4/11/2010 5:09:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Not to mention that with team training it is hardly likely you are going to have a competitive team filled with youngsters.

Certainly 2 position training is much more worthwhile, I would agree. Just playing devil's advocate a little.

From: JohnnyB
This Post:
00
140145.18 in reply to 140145.17
Date: 4/11/2010 5:20:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
My experience after 6 seasons on the game, is indeed the 2 positions training is the best for a young team. Is the same route that i got too. Actually i started to train 1 position since the 2nd half of the last season, but again my team has great domestic success, and now i dont really need to fill any positions. I am on the process for upgrades. 1 player away to repeat my title, and i have plenty cash for that.

So in sum, if you are looking for team success your best bet is 2 position training. To chose 1 position should be 1)Have a player that can play on your NT, but you sacrifice the team development. 2)Be a team on a similar position like mine. Thats my opinion...

From: zyler

This Post:
00
140145.20 in reply to 140145.19
Date: 4/11/2010 6:52:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
having 2 weaker players in 2 pos's , which doesnt matter as much the lower your div is, due to weaker teams.


From: RussBass

This Post:
00
140145.23 in reply to 140145.22
Date: 4/11/2010 8:47:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
If you want to train all your own players there will come a point where you will prob have to sacrifice a few games to train your guys for the future. I have noticed since I moved to div 3 this year I am making a ton more money than the other people in my league by looking at the average, but that should change because I am losing alot and I dont really have anyone to train atm and it is irritating me. So i either gotta find a player to train or save up cash to buy a good player.

Main thing that I didnt do soon enough was to decide on a training routine and stick with it.

Rusty

From: SM

This Post:
00
140145.24 in reply to 140145.22
Date: 4/11/2010 9:48:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
Actually, I started training 18 year olds the season after I promoted to II.1. They did start out as a liability, but my team was still good enough to avoid demotion, and those 18yos are now on their U21s and will soon become my best players.

Also, BC Törööö, 4 time BBB champion, has been training a trio of SFs since the age of 18. They're probably not a long way off from becoming some of the best SFs in the world.

Some teams do buy older trainees to remain competitive, but a fair number of top division teams train players from 18 as well, though I don't know of any that two position train them. It can be a good strategy in the long term, especially if you don't have the kind of money to buy older trainees that have been trained effectively.

This Post:
00
140145.25 in reply to 140145.22
Date: 4/11/2010 10:02:03 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
I think the teams in the top divisions can afford to have 1 youngster as a trainee. This guy would likely have high potential and would be 1 position trained to make the U21 and possibly the senior NT.

This Post:
00
140145.26 in reply to 140145.25
Date: 4/12/2010 3:01:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I find it difficult to credit that all the top leagues in the world are so tough that all teams within them can afford to have 1 trainee youngster only.

Advertisement