BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Dear FIFA,

Dear FIFA,

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
165363.17 in reply to 165363.1
Date: 12/2/2010 5:41:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Hey now, good for Qatar. Maybe the US should eliminate fan apathy and consider investing in an infrastructure that isn't complete shit? The over-reliance on interstates and domestic air travel likely didn't sit well with foreigners who are used to more efficient systems.

Qatar's presentation was more creative and inspired than that of the USA. The game will expand into a booming market (actually, Qatar should send the USA a thank-you note for that) and the event will be a beacon of globalization (the good kind.)

Last edited by RiseandFire at 12/2/2010 5:41:46 PM

This Post:
00
165363.18 in reply to 165363.17
Date: 12/2/2010 9:43:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Yes, not having a high speed rail system is what cost the US the bid... ::rolls eyes::

This Post:
11
165363.19 in reply to 165363.18
Date: 12/2/2010 11:05:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Yes, not having a high speed rail system is what cost the US the bid... ::rolls eyes::

Certainly doesn't help. When your host cities are so far apart, one can do nothing but laugh when cars and short flights are relied on so heavily, and our idea of cutting edge high-speed rail is the f*cking Acela. Cost efficiency, time efficiency, and eco-friendliness are all considered when it comes to transportation. These concepts are as foreign to the US as the idea of "Just rent a SUV" is to the FIFA voters.

Qatar brought something original to the table and was rightfully rewarded. Do you really want games played in American football stadiums with no atmosphere whatsoever? It should actually be viewed as admirable that FIFA (who only cares about money and is corrupt etc. etc.) rewarded a new, creative, and in many ways risky idea over an old, tired, but revenue-generating plan.

Get over it guys, the right choice was made.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 12/2/2010 11:05:24 PM

This Post:
33
165363.20 in reply to 165363.19
Date: 12/2/2010 11:31:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Certainly doesn't help. When your host cities are so far apart, one can do nothing but laugh when cars and short flights are relied on so heavily, and our idea of cutting edge high-speed rail is the ******* Acela. Cost efficiency, time efficiency, and eco-friendliness are all considered when it comes to transportation. These concepts are as foreign to the US as the idea of "Just rent a SUV" is to the FIFA voters.


Yeah, the Russian host cities are all right next door to each other.


NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
165363.21 in reply to 165363.20
Date: 12/3/2010 12:00:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Not the point. I'm not trying to justify the legitimacy of the decision making process, only the legitimacy of Qatar's bid in contrast to America's, which was extremely weak from a neutral perspective.

The location of host cities and lack of efficient transportation is a potential drawback, is all. I don't know if Russia has any plans to remedy their own problems in this regard. But that issue is unrelated to the 2022 vote.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 12/3/2010 12:00:18 AM

This Post:
00
165363.22 in reply to 165363.21
Date: 12/3/2010 12:19:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I find it difficult to invest in the idea that the USA was hurt by being geographically big and Qatar not big when humongous Russia (and to be fair, it appears only their cities west of the Urals are involved) won their vote over not so big England.

It's not like different committees voted - it was the same voters and the same criteria.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
165363.23 in reply to 165363.22
Date: 12/3/2010 12:29:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Of course, but so many other factors are at play that it's impossible to compare. You can't equate Russia to the USA and Qatar to England based on size alone. Brazil has many of the same problems, yet is still hosting in 2014. Really, it's impossible to know what factors voters cared about the most.

This Post:
00
165363.24 in reply to 165363.23
Date: 12/3/2010 1:15:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Qatar was the right choice? Sorry but you'll never convince me of that. I suppose you thought England had the weakest bid for 2018?

This Post:
11
165363.25 in reply to 165363.24
Date: 12/3/2010 6:56:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
IMHO, there are lots of weird things around and especially in the FIFA. Russia? Qatar? I could have understood why Russia won if there wasn't the candidacy of England, but come on... And the point is that there were more qualitative files - compared to Russia - on the table, like for example: U.S.A. & Portugal/Spain.

I'm not even going to discuss about Qatar... Qatar... World cup in Qatar... The players are going to play in a stadium with air-conditioning LOL... And once their game done, they'll struggle with a climate nearing 40°C/104°F. Weird conditions for what is suppose to be the biggest event.

Last edited by Pipat Kitamakin at 12/3/2010 6:56:24 AM

This Post:
00
165363.26 in reply to 165363.22
Date: 12/3/2010 9:09:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I find it difficult to invest in the idea that the USA was hurt by being geographically big and Qatar not big when humongous Russia (and to be fair, it appears only their cities west of the Urals are involved) won their vote over not so big England.


European Russia is 4 million sq kilometers. The continental USA is 9.5 million sq kilometers.

This Post:
33
165363.27 in reply to 165363.26
Date: 12/3/2010 10:51:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
European Russia is 4 million sq kilometers. The continental USA is 9.5 million sq kilometers.


And?

I am 6'2. Glen Davis is 6'9".

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Advertisement