BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Tactics Poll

Tactics Poll

Set priority
Show messages by
From: MetallicA

This Post:
00
197140.18 in reply to 197140.17
Date: 9/27/2011 9:17:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
IMO IS has little to do with LI success, because it has little to do with success of inside shots. It is a factor.....but in my experiments, like running LI today and watching what happened with my players shooting....IS was not as important for success as other things. Not at all.


I totally disagree with that one. IS is (in my opinion) the most important skill to make LI work well.

From: Sharooz
This Post:
00
197140.20 in reply to 197140.19
Date: 9/28/2011 4:34:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
I've beaten better teams playing low post m2m vs look inside m2m a couple of times...
I choose princeton however, had great success with it as an outside tactic, works better for my team then motion atleast...

This Post:
00
197140.21 in reply to 197140.20
Date: 9/28/2011 10:52:41 AM
Carbó VB Ploiesti
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
147147
That's weird.
To me that's viceversa. Princeton works like hell, while with motion I had some pretty good matches against stronger teams...

Anyhow... my question remains valid:why doesn't anyone trust the new tactics?

This Post:
11
197140.22 in reply to 197140.21
Date: 9/28/2011 11:21:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
The new offencive tactics are for teams who have one solid player. Most of the forum visitors tend to gather a team instead of having just one superstar. I have used 4+1 defences against a few teams with a clear single scorer and they work well. Their usage is very situational, just like 1-3-1 or 2-3.

Last edited by Kukoc at 9/28/2011 11:21:16 AM

This Post:
00
197140.23 in reply to 197140.21
Date: 9/28/2011 6:07:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
I agree with what LA-Kukoc said.
I don't however use the isolation tactics, not even when I had only 1 superstar. (maybe he wasn't super enough)
I had a center who was pretty damn good for div 2 when I was there,I played inside ice, ended up with some player taking a lot of 3s.
The center was not scoring so much (10-16 I guess, cba to find old games).
I don't really have any exp with outside ice except from scrimmages so don't ask me about that one.

About princeton, it might just be my team... I just find myself shooting at a higher % with the slower pace, though I get more 3p attempts when I play motion where as princeton will take some mid range shots, it still seems to even out well for me.
I know a lot of players don't trust princeton, but I guess that just makes it all the more interesting hehe :)

Last edited by Sharooz at 9/28/2011 6:08:41 PM