BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > TIE vs CT

TIE vs CT

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
25262.17 in reply to 25262.15
Date: 4/20/2008 3:37:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
What is your source for this?

Regardless, TIE vs CT will give that message - period.


what is your source that TIE vs CT will give that message?



The BB team.
Can you link to that BB-statement?

Last edited by chespirito at 4/20/2008 3:38:53 AM

This Post:
00
25262.18 in reply to 25262.17
Date: 4/20/2008 4:32:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
you will not know whether it means the home team was playing Crunch Time against Normal or whether the home team was playing Normal against Take it Easy


It is obvious, when there is 1 level difference there will be messages like tried harder etc. Those would be CT-normal and normal-easy. And when there is 2 level difference the message is different saying xx was the only team who tried (logical eh?) when you have CT-TIE it is quite obvious that only 1 team was really trying.

This Post:
00
25262.19 in reply to 25262.18
Date: 4/20/2008 4:42:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
As I said it is likely and as you said it is logical, but that does not mean that it is prooven. There has been no official statement confirming it (that I have seen) nor any major investigation made (that I have seen).

For those of you that have played HT, you might have seen the mythbusting thread and specifically the clown issue. For many years it was cnsidered a true that "clowns" worked, it was even inludd in the rules (even though it was not refered to as clowns), however I never trusted that, as I could not see any proof of it having an effect (thus I have never had a clown), and now finally it is stated that they actually dont.

For now I will keep using the information as something that is "likely" to be true.

From: dmonray
This Post:
00
25262.20 in reply to 25262.19
Date: 4/20/2008 9:09:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Alright let me ask him and I will get back to all of you..Ü

This Post:
00
25262.21 in reply to 25262.15
Date: 4/20/2008 10:13:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
This is interesting. Until this weekend, I had never seen the "played like the only team out there" statement in a box score. Is this just a presentation change, or has it appeared in games before this weekend?

Edit: OK, found one in my league from 4/15. I guess that makes sense. More teams will be CTing orTIEing late in the season, so the chances are gretaer to get a CT vs. TIE game. Nevertheless, interesting new wrinkle.

Last edited by MagicMan at 4/20/2008 10:17:33 AM

From: Huzzel

This Post:
00
25262.22 in reply to 25262.21
Date: 4/20/2008 10:19:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
sorry I dont get why everyone is still discussing about it.

this is something we have had severall times before, everyone knows what the only logic explanition is and this case is not stated in the rules.

a computer program does not behave different each time when it is getting the same input, it is always reacting the exayt same way. I think it is very obvious then.

Last edited by Huzzel at 4/20/2008 10:58:57 AM

From: dhoff

This Post:
00
25262.23 in reply to 25262.22
Date: 4/20/2008 10:34:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
a computer program does not behave different each time when it is getting the same income, it is always reacting the exayt same way. I think it is very obvious then.

Huh?

This Post:
00
25262.25 in reply to 25262.22
Date: 4/20/2008 1:33:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
You could always add some random to it (just as in the game engine).

This Post:
00
25262.26 in reply to 25262.25
Date: 4/20/2008 1:40:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
lol this thread is funny.

(ct vs tie is just that message, if you want to believe it or not, it is)

This Post:
00
25262.27 in reply to 25262.26
Date: 4/20/2008 1:48:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
If you are so sure about that it should be very easy to prove, but this far none that have tried to make fun about people that are skeptic has been even close to present a proof.

Thus I keep believing that it is in fact so, but I would never say that something is for sure if I do not have good evidence for it.

So let see your proof, as you laugh at people that don't think it is proven... ;)

Advertisement