When scouts watch a game, they make an assessment not only of his current skills, but also of his potential, considering his physical attributes. For example, if they watch an outstanding college players, but undersized for his position, they will say that his potential is low because his skills won't translate well to NBA level.
Yes but there is no such thing as physical attributes in BB. There's only height and it just matters for training efficiency.
The current draft system makes not sense, and the first interview gives an information that is completely worthless. I was mistaken because I didn't think this could be so bad!
I don't agree, they both are good filters. First scouting you get rid of the low skills and then with interviews you can focus on high potentials. You need both of them to be 90% sure you choosed the right guys.
And it costs a lot of scouting points but that's part of the drafting strategy
Last edited by slamdunk9 at 8/2/2020 4:46:54 PM