BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Tracking Scouting Units Purchased

Tracking Scouting Units Purchased

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
8520.17 in reply to 8520.16
Date: 8/18/2008 1:29:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
However, the thread was closed by GM-JuicePats with a link to this thread and no explanation, but I guess he means that I should move my suggestion to this thread, so here it is (together with following comments):


As is standard procedure, that is correct.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
8520.18 in reply to 8520.17
Date: 8/18/2008 2:01:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Ok, if closing threads and linking to a one old threads with no explanation is standard procedure, then fair enough*.

----
* However it feels like it makes the forums (suddenly there are two related issues listed, thus putting some other topic away from the list) and threads (e.g. people that you want to reply to might not be possible to reply to anymore) unnecessarily difficult to follow.

This Post:
00
8520.19 in reply to 8520.1
Date: 8/18/2008 2:14:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I posted this in another forum:

I see my option on the Training page for this week's spending, but nothing that shows how many 'scouting units' I can expect to have come draft day. This would be useful information to have access to.

This is an excellent idea.

This Post:
00
8520.20 in reply to 8520.18
Date: 8/18/2008 3:07:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Ok, if closing threads and linking to a one old threads with no explanation is standard procedure, then fair enough*.

----
* However it feels like it makes the forums (suddenly there are two related issues listed, thus putting some other topic away from the list) and threads (e.g. people that you want to reply to might not be possible to reply to anymore) unnecessarily difficult to follow.


It's always been standard procedure to close duplicate threads and link to the original.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
8520.21 in reply to 8520.20
Date: 8/18/2008 4:09:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Just a final note, I did not question if it was stabdard or not. I'm just questioning if it is a good way to get a readable forum. Of course if two similar threads are open at the same time it makes sence to merge them into one. But to merge a thread with a dead, one year old thread that treats another (related) issue, just makes it difficult to follow. Over and out on this issue.

Last edited by chespirito at 8/18/2008 4:16:53 PM