BuzzerBeater Forums

ok your main argument against 2-3 is that you score to easy against certain opposing defences (3-2), or to hard against (mtm).

So your super advategeous 3-2, have also disadvantages ;)

Sure, anything is perfect :P

one more for u (32835489)

23 zone against a team with round about 3 times higher team salary

..it works pretty well, but after the halftime the "stupid" coach change option of the engine kills it ;-)

2 first 2 matches are imo a way to show that 2-3 can work in some ways. Sorry, i did not read the whole topic, but i just cant agree with the statement that 2-3 does not work at all. 2-3 isnt working all the time, but in some cases its the best tactic to choose. And i can back it up with many matches. The main reason its working, give some more shot % but lesser possessions.

And about your opinion that a M2M would have won me the game is just plain wrong. I have seen you make that statement more than once, but i cant agree with it at all. You just dont know my squad that well apparantly, and thats not a problem and quite normall also. Its not your team.
An example. I know my inside man are aggressive players. It has his upsides, aggresive man, but also his problems They get very easy in foul trouble against a Look Inside when i choose a M2M defence. Many matches to back that up. Specially against big man who can dunk and shoot.. Like Hostivars players. When i had played a M2M i can almost guarantee you that VdL and or Del Valle/Pastoor would have fouled out after 3 or less quarters. Specially Del Valle and Pastoor who dont have the OD that Van der Linde has compared to the big man from Hostivar who have great js skills. They would have crushed them inside.

Besides the personal foul thing, Hostivar had the better players, better shapes. Its not that hard to see that the team with the better players in the same tactic Inside/M2M vs Inside/M2M is gonna win. Hostivar would have won it. No doubt about that. I had to use his one weakness, the lack of rebounding, in my advantage. And i did that, i came short only 3 points..And that was a great result, when you compare the players in skillpoints per position.

Last edited by Maupster at 6/6/2011 1:22:23 PM

I think 2-3 is not flawed. It's just a poor little misunderstood kid whom no one wanna play with...

I want to play with it.

Hey EVERYONE, the 2-3 ZONE WORKS! (15422). YEAH!

(32901902)

Kinda nice how a weak player can score 29 points that easy...