BuzzerBeater Forums

It is you who are assuming that I don't have the knowledge to distinguish when a random result is normal and when it is not. If I say the psychologist has had a huge and undesirable effect this training session it is because it has. And if not, prove me wrong.

Why are you whining so much? You talk about how much math knowledge you have but I see no math in your post only complaining. Anyway you haven't "proved" anything with your nonsense. No one has to prove you wrong it's you who has to prove what your saying is correct.

Minutes and game shapes of the starters for my biggest rival in league.
84 minutes, GS=9
87 minutes, GS=7
72 minutes, GS=9
77 minutes, GS=9
68 minutes, GS=9.

Most of these minutes aren't even that high and his starter who played the most minutes has lower GS. After 2 weeks you have a problem with the staff and you want Marin to take them away just because you don't like them? You don't own the game.

PS: In real basketball starting lineup is also way more important than the bench. Look at the Raptors, they had the deepest bench in the league and you see what happened to them. Cavs had one really good player and they made it all the way to the finals. Warriors win every year cause they have the best 5 man lineup in the league.

I am very curious about your future success after you move from training.

I think that Sports Psychologist should be able to train players potential.

That’s not a good idea. By changing players potential, big time teams could continuously make att players by employing world renowned guys, and they’re would be way more high salaries players which would completely change the market, training and the game.

Well your thoughts are correct, I mean how can you change ones potential, and if you could bigger teams would have ATG in their roster. But they couldn’t afford more than 4-5. On the other hand they could sell them for millions these 23-25 ATG