BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181900.173 in reply to 181900.172
Date: 6/6/2011 9:09:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
one more for u (32835489)

23 zone against a team with round about 3 times higher team salary

..it works pretty well, but after the halftime the "stupid" coach change option of the engine kills it ;-)


From: Maupster

This Post:
00
181900.174 in reply to 181900.169
Date: 6/6/2011 1:19:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
284284
2 first 2 matches are imo a way to show that 2-3 can work in some ways. Sorry, i did not read the whole topic, but i just cant agree with the statement that 2-3 does not work at all. 2-3 isnt working all the time, but in some cases its the best tactic to choose. And i can back it up with many matches. The main reason its working, give some more shot % but lesser possessions.

And about your opinion that a M2M would have won me the game is just plain wrong. I have seen you make that statement more than once, but i cant agree with it at all. You just dont know my squad that well apparantly, and thats not a problem and quite normall also. Its not your team.
An example. I know my inside man are aggressive players. It has his upsides, aggresive man, but also his problems They get very easy in foul trouble against a Look Inside when i choose a M2M defence. Many matches to back that up. Specially against big man who can dunk and shoot.. Like Hostivars players. When i had played a M2M i can almost guarantee you that VdL and or Del Valle/Pastoor would have fouled out after 3 or less quarters. Specially Del Valle and Pastoor who dont have the OD that Van der Linde has compared to the big man from Hostivar who have great js skills. They would have crushed them inside.

Besides the personal foul thing, Hostivar had the better players, better shapes. Its not that hard to see that the team with the better players in the same tactic Inside/M2M vs Inside/M2M is gonna win. Hostivar would have won it. No doubt about that. I had to use his one weakness, the lack of rebounding, in my advantage. And i did that, i came short only 3 points..And that was a great result, when you compare the players in skillpoints per position.

Last edited by Maupster at 6/6/2011 1:22:23 PM

Ben je op zoek naar een BB-Buddy die jou alle kneepjes van BB bijbrengt? Neem dan deel aan het Buddy-sytem. Pm mij voor meer info
This Post:
11
181900.177 in reply to 181900.176
Date: 6/13/2011 3:08:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I think 2-3 is not flawed. It's just a poor little misunderstood kid whom no one wanna play with...

I want to play with it.


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
181900.178 in reply to 181900.177
Date: 6/20/2011 4:17:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
Hey EVERYONE, the 2-3 ZONE WORKS! (15422). YEAH!

Check the Suggestions they are important
From: Marot
This Post:
00
181900.179 in reply to 181900.1
Date: 6/25/2011 4:16:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
(32901902)

Kinda nice how a weak player can score 29 points that easy...

This Post:
00
181900.180 in reply to 181900.179
Date: 6/25/2011 6:44:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
181900.181 in reply to 181900.179
Date: 6/26/2011 4:44:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(32832544) - the only think you could argue his is 3pt percentage in the last minute, but i believe thats more random ;)

From: Marot

This Post:
00
181900.182 in reply to 181900.181
Date: 6/26/2011 10:12:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
But your game shapes were much better...

Advertisement