BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3

B3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
164600.174 in reply to 164600.173
Date: 12/9/2010 8:57:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Not Poker. Sometimes they show heart rates of players who just went all-in... you wouldnt believe what you see


I agree... but im not arguing whether a sport is better based on heart-rate...

I have never watched a basketball game from start to finish. Where as I could watch snooker, poker, golf all afternoon... fishing I couldn't either.

This Post:
33
164600.176 in reply to 164600.174
Date: 12/9/2010 9:18:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
Anyway I agree. Its stupid to divide sports/not sports by heart-rate

This Post:
22
164600.177 in reply to 164600.169
Date: 12/9/2010 12:14:43 PM
SK Valmiera
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
geez, if we count sports only based on toughness, endurance and heart rate, then let's keep Hawaiian ultra-triathlon and ban everything else :D

This Post:
44
164600.178 in reply to 164600.177
Date: 12/9/2010 12:31:23 PM
AS Barroom Heroes
IV.3
Overall Posts Rated:
10201020
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
While you guys are discussing random subjects, Silves has already been bought (by an italian team) and put on the market again, with the sole purpose of winning today's cup match.

At this point, paying the player's salary when the player is bought seems like an absolute necessity. Basically the dude that bought him could buy a monster a week right up to the cup final (he and everybody else) and not pay a dime except for the taxes he forfeits when he sells him, since the transfer price is alway more or less the same...1M-1.3M.

This Post:
00
164600.180 in reply to 164600.178
Date: 12/9/2010 12:54:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
In my opinion it would be better to not make just bought players eligible for any games of their new teams except scrimmages (and PL games maybe) until after economic update. In addition seome players (based on numbers of days with their current teams) should not be able to play in a non scrimmage game if they are on TL at the time (cause server issues, lets say if they were on TL 6 or less hours before the game).

Taht seems to be a smotther solution to me, the aim is to not let unpaid players play, this would also prevent last minute additions and it could make a difference whether you pay immediately or normally on Monday. Othetrwise teams with road games (less income) would have disadvantage in comparison to those with home games and wouldn't be able to react cause possible bankruptcy (if double salary is paid if they would keep the player/unable to sell him).

This Post:
11
164600.181 in reply to 164600.180
Date: 12/9/2010 1:21:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
229229
It would be better if players like Silves had wages that allowed people to really want them on a long term basis. This way lots of people would want them, and then they would be sold for 10kk, and not for 1kk, and kept for a long time by the team who bought them. Nevertheless, it seems it won't ever happen.
Making teams pay in advance player's wages won't change anything, it will only undervalue even more those 300k-500k players in order to compensate the extra money spent on wages.
The best solution for B3 would be to freeze rosters. Teams would be allowed to play with the same players that started the competition.


Last edited by LA-Bernspin at 12/9/2010 1:24:48 PM

This Post:
00
164600.182 in reply to 164600.181
Date: 12/9/2010 1:26:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Team in B3 have different needs outside of B3. Wouldn't work (or it wouldn't be fair).

This Post:
00
164600.183 in reply to 164600.182
Date: 12/9/2010 1:34:08 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
the best solution would be stopping creating this crappy players... or buy them and fire them

This Post:
00
164600.184 in reply to 164600.183
Date: 12/9/2010 1:40:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
You cannot fire player on NT rosters. And many of those monster will be stuck there for a long time (in many cases till another monster will push them out one day).

I agree, they shouldn't be created at all, but if NT managers are ok with monsters with game shape 5 or 6 due to constatnt switching teams and overpalying, they probably think they are still useful for them, so they won't die out in foreseeable future.

Advertisement