BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > [NT] Team Update

[NT] Team Update

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
30905.174 in reply to 30905.171
Date: 10/21/2008 7:42:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
GM-JuicePats is right. I have a bad habit of calling users GMs. Since they are technically GMs of their teams, but in this game they'd be better called users. Now we're even. Haha.

This Post:
00
30905.175 in reply to 30905.1
Date: 10/21/2008 10:25:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Regards to the low rating of the inside offense, I guess it may somehow relate to the sf you pick. I think the start sf should be more likely have strong guard skills but weaker forward skills... so if you try to play look inside, he may not contribute a lot.
My suggestion is that you can put a player with strong inside skills and decent guard skills(like my player Marc) to play sf when you want to try look inside... after all, Scott's salary is high but he seems can only play defense? I dont think so.

Maybe I'm wrong, but if you never tried it, why not? If you have tried, just ignore what I say....

This Post:
00
30905.176 in reply to 30905.175
Date: 10/22/2008 7:30:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Too bad he's injured

This Post:
00
30905.177 in reply to 30905.167
Date: 10/22/2008 11:36:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
- Roster management. We didn't cut the roster down to 12 at the enthusiasm reset, which is 100% indefensible. We've been carrying the same 14 players for as long as I can remember... possibly as early as week 1 of uflorin's term.


We started with 12 players, added another one based on injuries, then another one, sometime close to mid last season and stayed with the 14 players roster until now.

It was a choice I made and I see no issue with it.

Firing 2 players for the sake of firing is not an advantage, but, in this case, a dissadvantage for the team. There is still space for extra additions and, besides, I don't know of any great players that would be good assets to the team. The dissadvantage would be that the dropped players will probably not be available at the time I need them since they would be picked up by the U21 probably if under 21 (an one of the possible dropped ones would be).

Team kept flexibility with the still remaining open spots.

Of course, the explanation you gave means that's how you would have done it, but I don't think that's the best way... Stating it's 100% indefensible is rather curious. You have your opinion, I have mine. If season would end now and would have to deal with yet another season I would still keep the current 14 players roster, I don't have any problem with that in the current Canadian environment.

This Post:
00
30905.180 in reply to 30905.179
Date: 10/22/2008 6:40:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
Marc Hederman is in no way or form a small forward and should not even be considered for that spot.


And Aubert and Caron?

This Post:
00
30905.181 in reply to 30905.178
Date: 10/22/2008 7:21:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Silly me to think that a post which followed mine so closely, and which referred to not knowing what's going after I commented that I hadn't followed the team that closely this season, might be addressing my post.

My mistake apparently.

This Post:
00
30905.182 in reply to 30905.180
Date: 10/22/2008 7:38:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
SO U THINK U CAN MATCH MAH WRITNG SKILS???!!?! WTF LOL I ACAPT UR CHALAGE!1!1!11! LOL GOD LUK!!!11

Message deleted
From: laziester

To: RiP
This Post:
00
30905.184 in reply to 30905.179
Date: 10/22/2008 7:48:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
you should be correct, but who knows if no evidence?

and my focus is not taking my player to play sf, I just suggest that uflorin can try use a player who is strong in forward skills to play at that spot instead of the player strong in guard skills. I dont care if he use my player, I just suggest using different player when using other offense tactis.

Last edited by laziester at 10/22/2008 7:52:09 PM

Advertisement