BuzzerBeater Forums

I think all teams should stay I the division they are currently in after the merge. If the new merged leagues more than 16 D1 managers, there needs to be multiple D1 leagues and some creative relegation after the first season to get one league.

People may spend more in the short term because of the increased competition but in the long run there will be less d1 leagues and less d1 teams and less money going into the economy.

I think all teams should stay I the division they are currently in after the merge. If the new merged leagues more than 16 D1 managers, there needs to be multiple D1 leagues and some creative relegation after the first season to get one league.

People may spend more in the short term because of the increased competition but in the long run there will be less d1 leagues and less d1 teams and less money going into the economy.

And this is exactly why it matters to the big nations as well as the small

As Senegal NT coach, i'm not really "hot" with that idea. Senegal is not a big country but we have a little community with a project.

Senegal has about seven active managers. It's great that you're having fun with little projects and goals you've set for the Senegalese NT and I'm sure everyone involved is appreciative of what you're doing, but it's kind of selfish of you to oppose a change to micro-nations in order to keep that going. You're not the one who has to play in a dead league and country.

Hum, I may don't understand your answer. Selfish? I just show you that it could work in micro nations. Before trying to merge micro-nations, I think that there are a lot of better solutions to improve the level. I talked about saving good potentials drafted by bots. What do you think about that?
I only talk about NT and not leagues of course.

Since it's abundantly clear that option 1 is no longer viable, the flag issue is no longer a concern.

Oh I see. I guess the real difference between solution 1 and 2 were the National Tournaments. Maybe Option 4 (which I proposed on page 1) might still be a possible micronationmanagers would like.

Otherwise Option 2 could be implemented. During the discussion here it seems that it would not be so bad and some small nation managers really like their national team, which I really understand. also it is a possibility for micronation users to get attached to each other and communicate with folks in their native language.

Would there be another solution to improve national tournaments? maybe the nations of a merged league would have to figure out in a small qualification cup which national team will play in the Big Tournament.

Or the national tournament would only be played by the best teams. and we have a second league/tournament, where smaller nations play a tournament. of course there would be promotion and demotion between the tournaments.

but thats off topic ..

Last edited by jonte at 4/10/2016 7:37:48 PM