BuzzerBeater Forums

Refer to previous posts

Refer to previous posts

I saw. You said pick 1 player you are willing to go up to 1.7 mil on. Bad idea.

So after reading a lot and seeing how yourself and headless t gunner interpret stuff.... I am trying to phrase delicately

I am suggesting if he aims for 1 player he likes at a time and has his full 1.7 mil... He can piece together the 3-4 players he needs easier than if he goes for all 4 of them at once

Also the fact that he is in d.v and has this much money says a lot too.
He doesn't even need to really target a group of 4 that would cost him that much either to promote.

It means we have no way of better options beyond the options given, everything people say fall on deaf ears.

i understand your point in full..Btw Im ready promoted, Im trying to get supporters soon and retire 2 players and get 3 more becuase i know what to have and skills to look for in the tactic im trying to play. Im building for the a long the term not promotion rom v division. I need the team more stronger in skill becuase this team was old and with good skills, when i got them, I got no trainees to start , all my drafts throught out those season wont worth a dam to keep. if I kept them i wouldve never gotten out of the league.

I misunderstnd what you said at 1st time but i understand your points now . Thats what i did for 2 weeks now got no players. Out 20 players in my time on this game trying to get them. i have gotten only 4. Thats a problem if you ask me, thats a 5% rate.

The market is the back bone of the teams sucess in rebuilding nothe draft in my opinion.. i dont think drafting all the time is the best way to play for every body an shoul dbe only way to play.. I see why teams tank and quit becuase if the market is not there for them and building youth takes a long time, so does players experience and skills and etc etc etc. I could go on but its going to fall on deaf ears

Nothing wrong with buying free agents or doing it that way .. the payee has to pay the agents finders fee and players year salary out right.. I dont see how thats a adavantage its more expensive than bidding with the finding fee and the players years salary outright.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 3/4/2013 4:12:47 PM

4/20 = 20%

I feel you man. It can be a real pain to acquire good players from the TL. It takes a lot of time and patience, and I've missed out on a couple of great buys because of a last minute bid while I was doing something else for a moment. I'm lucky though that I work on a laptop all day and got plenty of time to check and bid on players, but for those that can't spend a lot of time on the game, I understand the bidding process is a big hurdle.

But, it's very hard to have a fair and at the same time easy system. Maybe a blind bid system would be something to think about. Every can submit a price they're willing to pay, and nothing is shown until the deadline, at which the highest bidder gets the player. Problem then is reserving the cash that is spend on bids; you don't know wether you currently have the highest bid so you cannot spend your money otherwise as long as you have a bid on a player, even when it's not the highest.

4/20=5

20/4 = 5

4/20 = .20

You know... This game involves quite a bit of math... You may want to brush up on your algebra.

Just saying.


Edit: the fact that you are still arguing without checking a calculator on your math that you are way too overconfident in, tells me you are a person who doesn't like to admit when they are wrong or very good at taking criticism objectively.


Last edited by ShadowSlam at 3/5/2013 3:27:04 PM

20/4 = 5

4/20 = .20

You know... This game involves quite a bit of math... You may want to brush up on your algebra.

Just saying.


Edit: the fact that you are still arguing without checking a calculator on your math that you are way too overconfident in, tells me you are a person who doesn't like to admit when they are wrong or very good at taking criticism objectively.

I think what you're discounting is that although he's 4 for 20 now, he knows he's going to be 1 for his next 80 and therefore it really will be a 5% rate. Clearly you're just not seeing the big picture here. ;)