BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Best method for scouting best player

Best method for scouting best player

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
265434.18 in reply to 265434.17
Date: 12/18/2014 2:52:36 PM
The Monty Python´s Flying Circus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
462462
ok, tell me the prize for a potential 10 and 53 skills18 years?


also, homegrown guys give you back each week in shop or merchandasing,the more u train him the more u earn


so u really have to take many posibilities to do the maths ;)



Message deleted
From: Phyr

This Post:
00
265434.20 in reply to 265434.15
Date: 12/18/2014 4:47:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
654654
MVP can work for a SF, but everything else you pretty much need HOF or ATG. Of course for countries not in the top tier lower potential could work, but Serbia has a pretty good team and you were talking about homegrown players.

This Post:
11
265434.22 in reply to 265434.18
Date: 12/19/2014 5:56:48 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14211421
My point was not that investing 40k weekly is bad in all cases, I just warned that it's not good advice for every situation. Yes, if you really must have the highest potential highly skilled homegrown player, then it might be a good way to go, but the question was asked by a starting manager, and that might not be his goal. I was saying his money at that point is better spent elsewhere, like in the Arena while keeping scouting costs lower and not try for the jackpot every season.

The problem with many helpers here is that they give advice for their own situation, we need to take into account the situation of the question asker more often.

This Post:
00
265434.23 in reply to 265434.22
Date: 12/19/2014 10:42:14 AM
The Monty Python´s Flying Circus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
462462
,my point is,

investing 40000 is not bad in every cases, thats all ;) i just dont think like u

This Post:
00
265434.24 in reply to 265434.23
Date: 12/19/2014 3:11:52 PM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14211421
The case that matters is the case of the one that asks the question, which not everyone realizes ;)

This Post:
00
265434.25 in reply to 265434.24
Date: 12/19/2014 4:07:58 PM
The Monty Python´s Flying Circus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
462462
so the one that matters is the one he chosen,

theres no a right answer, just diferent points of view


From: Phyr

This Post:
00
265434.26 in reply to 265434.21
Date: 12/20/2014 11:10:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
654654
I understand that but for a new trainer they can be expecting to turn every SS or MVP player they draft into a NT player.

From: Aleksandar

To: Phyr
This Post:
00
265434.27 in reply to 265434.26
Date: 12/20/2014 12:54:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
However, by the same reasoning, you shouldn't discourage a novice player from training a NT star.

If someone is a newbie, doesn't mean he's stupid LOL For example, when I first started playing the game a got a nice MVP, whom I started loving and training. I went to help forums quickly and people gave me good advices. I started training secondary skills right off the bat. I also had help from Atlas1 and few other people, whom I mailed at regular basis.

So it's not like I would destroy my trainee, I was actually on a good path to train him properly, thanks to advices from more experienced managers. Unfortunately my team got banned after a season or two, I don't remember.

As you can see, pointing a newbie into particular path or learning curve may not be the best for him. In this case a newbie might get enamored with the game, if he has someone to train, or get bored quickly, if he gets pushed into tanking/arena building mode.

Last edited by Aleksandar at 12/20/2014 12:55:47 PM

From: Phyr

This Post:
33
265434.28 in reply to 265434.27
Date: 12/20/2014 1:22:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
654654
An overwhelming majority of new players are entirely ignorant and stupid. They will most of the time train not give a NT prospect the most efficient training needed. They would do more good to their national team by selling their HOF+ prospect to a more experienced manager.

With there be exceptions to the rule? Of course, but that is not a really strong argument because there are exceptions to every rule.

I would rather see a new player train a couple starter/star potential players that they could finish training relatively quickly. It's also less likely that bad training resulting in wasting a player's potential. They would get more immediate gratification when they are finished training lower potential players in a couple of seasons. These are players that would be key players for a new team for many seasons in the lower division and backups as the team begins to promote. After they finish training 3 starter/star potential players, they can have a go at training a new set of higher potential players.

A new manager that starts training an 18 year old to a top level NT next season will have to wait until the end of 2017 to finish training that player. I think my option is better to getting new players more involved and attached to the game.

Advertisement