BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > R-I-D-I-C-U-L-O-U-S

R-I-D-I-C-U-L-O-U-S

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
57037.18 in reply to 57037.17
Date: 11/9/2008 9:02:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
330330
and you are a BB?
You see tactics, MR.. ecc... or not???? XD

Lol

This Post:
00
57037.20 in reply to 57037.12
Date: 11/9/2008 9:12:18 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
He also took fewer shots because he played a slower tactic


this makes no sense

This Post:
00
57037.21 in reply to 57037.16
Date: 11/9/2008 9:18:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Other stupid answers.
Please
This thread is funny, I can understand the level of other leagues in the world.....
(Fly-down -Super-Fly speaks about Fagioli... LOL XD)


I'm trying to understand the message you want to get across.... has Fagioli been subject to 1 position training only since you acquired him?

I doubt he would improve half the managers starting line ups that have contributed to this 'funny' thread.

But that was just my 2 cents worth as it was obvious others were going to comment more on the tactics....

This Post:
00
57037.22 in reply to 57037.21
Date: 11/9/2008 9:38:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
227227
A part from Run&Gun vs Motion...
maybe Stamina played an important role in this match..
..

This Post:
00
57037.23 in reply to 57037.22
Date: 11/9/2008 9:46:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Slower tactics itself should give fewer possesions for both teams i.e. it should slow down the game. Apart of TOs, rebounds etc. I understand more passes means more turnovers often.

This Post:
00
57037.25 in reply to 57037.20
Date: 11/9/2008 9:52:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Was my sentence really that difficult to understand? I suppose I should have written:

Furthermore, Pericle's team had fewer field goal attempts presumably because motion, the offensive tactic employed, is slower paced than run and gun which was the (winning) tactic employed by his opponent.

Anyway, it's sour grapes by a guy who lost a tough game because his OF was inept, his PG couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, and the other team shot better and more frequently and created more turnovers.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
57037.26 in reply to 57037.22
Date: 11/9/2008 6:18:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
maybe he must win without but or if........

everyone in italy think this.... also the opponent....

you can speek if...... but.....on my match (that i think something of...... is better taht i dont' speek) but this.....

there is no reason to lose it

and if you don't know this ts is into the valuations and they played with the same strengh so..... don't try to explein a ridiculus theory please

This Post:
00
57037.27 in reply to 57037.26
Date: 11/10/2008 4:52:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11011101
maybe he must win without but or if........

everyone in italy think this.... also the opponent....

you can speek if...... but.....on my match (that i think something of...... is better taht i dont' speek) but this.....

there is no reason to lose it

and if you don't know this ts is into the valuations and they played with the same strengh so..... don't try to explein a ridiculus theory please


What?

This Post:
00
57037.28 in reply to 57037.27
Date: 11/10/2008 7:18:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I guess he's trying to say there's a common view in the Italian community on this match.

Most people think that this should have been won by Pericle, just because he had 2 full levels above his opponent OD. At the same time the rating of his opponent attack against the appropriate defense was just about the same.

If the ratings rise thanks to the mots by a fixed percentage the opponent should be even in a worse situation.

If you take a look at the shoots, 3pt shots have been 36 for pericle's team, vs 31 for his opponent.

Still, his opponent shoot with 50% from the field, despite being 2 full levels behind in inside attack.

Advertisement