BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > BB balance : Team Salary Cap

BB balance : Team Salary Cap

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Sparkle
This Post:
00
83152.18 in reply to 83152.17
Date: 4/4/2009 4:38:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
Anyone else with a view?

This Post:
00
83152.20 in reply to 83152.6
Date: 4/5/2009 6:28:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Inside strategies being weaker because of their higher wage doesn't hold true because the same wages for inside players also apply to the defender. To counteract an inside strategy, you need to invest in inside players of your own. It swings both ways, and should be a non-issue.


but you could match up pretty good with a high difference in salary ;)

Higher skills means higher difference ins alary but lowre effect on the game, then skill differences in a low area - and especially centers and PF aren't very good in this category.

From: Sparkle

This Post:
00
83152.21 in reply to 83152.19
Date: 4/5/2009 7:04:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
What you're speaking of is income, I am focused more on hoarding.

Relegated teams face attendance penalties which will affect their income, not their bank balance. As the top teams approach a negative deficit, teams that intend to challenge will need to do so as well. Hence when they relegate, it is because they choose not to compete and want to have a positive income instead. This is where money is accumulated.

It doesn't limit the range of different strategies avaiable, I've detailed this enough in the first two posts. It curtails the effect of being able to buy 'instant sucess' with money and promotes better tactical play among managers.

This Post:
00
83152.22 in reply to 83152.21
Date: 4/5/2009 7:29:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
It curtails the effect of being able to buy 'instant sucess' with money and promotes better tactical play among managers.


the same will happen with a salary cap, with the difference that teams will pay incredible sum for well rounded salary efficient players to max out the salary cap.

This Post:
00
83152.23 in reply to 83152.22
Date: 4/5/2009 8:54:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
Ah, sure they will be able to bring in great players but at a reduced effect. You cannot utilize your money to buy the best players in BB in every position anymore. And you will still need to plan what kind of players and how your team plays within the restriction of the salary cap. You cannot demolish teams in ALL areas on the court.

Will you go for an insanely inside focused team or balance it out between all the players? 5 monster starters or strength in reserve?

Winning will actually take some planning and tactics instead of flashing the cash.

This Post:
00
83152.24 in reply to 83152.23
Date: 4/5/2009 10:16:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Or winning will be the fact of hca, and the investement in the rooster ;)


The same thing like today, with the difference that many teams, have to sell there trainees because they reach their cap.



This Post:
00
83152.25 in reply to 83152.24
Date: 4/5/2009 11:14:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
HCA will help. After all, it's only natural that home court brings an advantage.

Investment in the roster is up in the air. As you cannot just bring in the biggest, most expensive player available. You take into account how much more you got before you hit the cap, and go for the best value. You will be challenged to take one road or the other, instead of solving it by throwing down a large sum of money for monster players.

This Post:
00
83152.26 in reply to 83152.25
Date: 4/5/2009 11:18:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i could use the same arguments for your theoy, in sayinfg that monster players are players with incredible value instead of salary ;)

This Post:
00
83152.27 in reply to 83152.26
Date: 4/5/2009 11:24:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
We could do that, but that would be detracting from the original objective of this thread which is reducing the effect of money buying success. :)

This Post:
00
83152.28 in reply to 83152.27
Date: 4/5/2009 11:27:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
so you don't say that buying superior player, isn't a way of buying succes?

In my eyes it is the same thing, maybe with the diffence that you could play succesfull for a longer time - but maybe also need to wait longer to buy 8-9 high skilled (young) low salary players.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 4/5/2009 11:28:22 AM

Advertisement