BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Player not sold tax

Player not sold tax (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
140518.181 in reply to 140518.180
Date: 5/12/2010 11:40:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Comon game shape and training do not cost half of his price. I'm not against buying low selling normal or top end. But if it does not sell at that top end or you overprice the player you should pay extra tax.
Your argument is about managers playing on the edge of cheating, deliberately trying to sell players over theyr value to managers who are not experienced enough.
I also had a suggestion how to stop farm teams. But it needs more work to limit these things happening.
Back to the topic, you have expressed that you want a tax levied based on nothing other than a personal opinion that stems from your own disatisfaction of seeing players at prices you wouldnt even conceive.

I want players that do not sell get taxed for 1% of their listing price. Atm there are no downside for fishing clicks or deliberately trying to cheat out money from lesser experienced players. It has nothing to do with which players I like or would like to buy. It's about managers who constantly overprice theyr players in order to gain unfair advantage. Are you saying these managers do not exist? or do you not care that they exist?
Maybe I should ask to impose a tax on you for buying a $1k guy and then dumping him.. perhaps whenever you sack a player within 1 month of buying him you pay 20x his wage as severence for ending his career? Perhaps this would stop people treating scrimmages so lightly?

You can suggest that if you want. I do not buy 1k players as I run 13 player squad. If I get hit with injury bug I can still manage without adding players to my team. You can suggest that sacking wage to protect NT players, I would love a rule that makes you play every player you buy for 5 games or receive no money if you sell him within a month of buying him:) I know my suggestion directly hurts you aswell. You can't come up with any idea that would actually hurt me, why? because I do not bend the rules.

This Post:
00
140518.182 in reply to 140518.155
Date: 5/12/2010 12:00:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Why "will be"?

Just estonian english. Very neat.

From: docend24

To: Edju
This Post:
00
140518.183 in reply to 140518.168
Date: 5/12/2010 12:08:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
LA-Kukoc wrote:
So like gipsys? Knowing you sell something that is not worth half that much? Deliberately trying to cheat more money out of people who do not know the correct price?

I don't think BB wants to promote racism at all!

This Post:
00
140518.184 in reply to 140518.181
Date: 5/12/2010 12:10:28 PM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13171317
Second Team:
Jirkov
So let's stop discussion on this thread with LA-Kukoc. Because it has totally no sense to try to discuss with him, because he knows all best and there is no way to persuade him some of his suggestions are not positive for this game. It's all waste of time to try to discuss with him.

From: rwystyrk

To: Edju
This Post:
00
140518.185 in reply to 140518.183
Date: 5/12/2010 12:13:19 PM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13171317
Second Team:
Jirkov
docend24 is right, if there is racism problem with LA-Kukoc, I expect lifetime kick out of the forum for him ;-)

This Post:
00
140518.186 in reply to 140518.184
Date: 5/12/2010 12:16:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Well on the other hand it is always good to make arguments on such a bad suggestions as this one is to prevent BBs from even be inlined to think that suggestion is vox populi. On this one I hope that chance this would be implemented is already as low as possible and letting this thread be one man discussion is ruight way to go :D

From: Edju
This Post:
00
140518.187 in reply to 140518.185
Date: 5/12/2010 12:16:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
This has taken a turn (and turn and turn) for the worse.

I'm going to close it, we certainly have enough sides of the argument to make a decision if we need to and this has degenerated into flaming.

Please play nice!

/Juiced

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
140518.188 in reply to 140518.158
Date: 5/13/2010 2:16:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
Just look at some of the top teams transfers. A lot rounded of sells with some 99.99 etc sells. Thus I came to a conclusion a lot of those top players are sold at their original set price. Ofcourse I can not say how many times has the player been listed, but looking at those evenly numbered sells, I presume that sales that have happened with oddly numbered results are actually the ones that have not had their listing price adjusted. Thus saying that many lowered starting price ends up being a bidwar and sells way above the initial price is unlogical.
Do you have facts to counter my logic?

not sure what has been said in the meantime.

But I have seen people bid 99.99 number just as often as sellers put it in their asking price.

It's psychological I think. If they bid 99 they feel they have him for less then 100 ...

on the other hand, in bidwars, the one going to the 99 often wins, as the next stage is deemed to much for the other bidders.

if one thinks the player is not worth 100, then he might get carried away and bid up to 99, but will refuse to bid the 100.


so I don't think the 99-theory is very reliable

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.