There is no limit to salary increase. You _will_ have to change your staff eventually.
Ouch! I suppose I will just have to dump them in a few weeks before I run out of money and hope prices for the current available staff even out. This is pretty far fetched as well. Employees of an organization forcing wage increases every week...silly. A better Idea would have been for teams to instead of biiding on a transfer fee to bid on the staff members weekly salary and then whatever you bid you will then have to pay each week. Then if your wage is considered too low then the GI could require a salary raise at the end of the season.
Well, I couldn't be more disappointed. The last thing I was expecting was to have to screw around with my staff more. And now I have to bid and auction for them. I'm not a day trader, I hate player auctions here and in Hattrick, but I deal with them. I'm a working professional who likes to drop in here for a bit of entertainment. I have no time or interest to be forced into bidding for my staff or suffering constantly increasing costs. I think this about does it for my Buzzerbeater experiment.
The increase seems to be pretty small - 1 to 2% of the salary. If you can't handle this for more than a few weeks, you have a problem that's quite bigger than the change in the staff system.As for whether wages increase weekly or not in reality, a real year doesn't have 16 weeks, either. Just imagine that when staff members conclude their contracts, they have a clause which includes periodical salary increases.
The increase seems to be pretty small - 1 to 2% of the salary. If you can't handle this for more than a few weeks, you have a problem that's quite bigger than the change in the staff system.As for whether wages increase weekly or not in reality, a real year doesn't have 16 weeks, either. Just imagine that when staff members conclude their contracts, they have a clause which includes periodical salary increases.Well that's obviously rich team point of view. Small or not it is increase ... and if can not handle that (and we are talking about 20% or 25% increase per season) what should I do.You're saying then I have much bigger problems ... so instead of resolving my bigger problems I will need to deal with more problems ... Great way to start the gameAnyway, for new managers, this increase may cause them to lower down scouting expenses ... which, directly, cause a lack of potential star players (just to remind all of you that scouting is maybe the only way for lower division teams to get a good player to train) ...
The increase in weekly wages will be substantially higher for what you call 'rich teams', since they will likely have more expensive staff.As for the bigger problems, you seem genuinely uninterested why your team is making enough money to pay the weekly bill. As long as you remain this way, I am afraid neither I, nor anyone else can help you.Money is not exactly difficult to make. Likewise, a gargantuan initial investment is not necessary: you can choose to train average players, 19 year olds, low-potential players, or any combination of the above. As long as you have a reasonable training program, it shouldn't take more than 2 seasons to build up some cash.
it is simple, rich teams now can place a bid if they want. Others cann't.
I just want a fair amount of justice for all ... and all of u trying your best to explain how the rich teams are in the same position as others. And they are not ... it is simple, rich teams now can place a bid if they want. Others cann't. Do you see the difference ?? ;)
it is simple, rich teams now can place a bid if they want. Others cann't.This is not the case.Maybe smaller teams may not be able to splash out for the shiniest staff out there, but that pretty much mirrors real life.