BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Princeton Tactic

Princeton Tactic

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Yuck

This Post:
00
218397.19 in reply to 218397.17
Date: 6/6/2012 3:35:47 AM
Cassville Yuck
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
555555
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
You don't have to be sorry when opposing me Olanipekun. I clearly stated I have no hard core data. Just thoughts and observations. I do however agree with Koperboy when he says the tactic bends towards your strengths. The Princeton you describe is also the way a team built for RNG would operate. Well you would be correct in saying that a RNG team playing Princeton would struggle against a 1-3-1 or a 3-2. If you explore my written thoughts I elude to a more passing and handling team operating the offense with less jr might eat up the soft spots in the 3-2 zone. I don't know for sure but I have seen what Koperboy stated where different builds operate differently within offenses and a different lineup within the same team can totally change a look of an offense.

This Post:
00
218397.20 in reply to 218397.18
Date: 6/7/2012 12:39:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I can agree with this. I ran Motion a lot in the past, and now I run more LP. I have noticed that my PG with 11 JS/JR attempts way more 3s than anyone on my team. In comparison, I have guards with 10 JS/6 JR, 10 JS/5 JR, 11 JS/7 JR. In fact, last season my PG was 41-128 from three, while the others were 15-60, 7-31, and 21-66. This season I have run LP for the most part, and my PG has gone 5-23. The others have so far has produced 3-16, 0-8, and 5-18. Does anyone know if a change in tactics can affect a player's three point shooting?

From: Big Dogs

This Post:
00
218397.22 in reply to 218397.21
Date: 6/7/2012 1:05:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I am sure this is true, as my players don't have enough HA/DR/PA imo. Could their +10 JS be a factor?