BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Ideal LI SG

Ideal LI SG

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
229877.19 in reply to 229877.18
Date: 11/15/2012 11:27:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
470470
I think IS its important, but you need also DR. Imo this player its ok, if i looking a men to play inside i will decide for something like that...

This example that i put with IS in 1 is really extremely, but its true.

To be clear i prefer this player JS 18- DR 16- IS-8 than JS18 DR 13 IS-10

Sorry for my english, a lot of time its difficult to me to explain well...

Message deleted
From: Gonza8

This Post:
00
229877.22 in reply to 229877.21
Date: 11/15/2012 12:04:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
470470
Can you at least erase only the links? I was trying to explain my idea, it wasnt also my players...

Strange rules...

From: Texas

This Post:
00
229877.24 in reply to 229877.8
Date: 11/15/2012 8:23:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
But the ratio favors "Inside Shots" over jumpers. Why in the world would you want a 15+ JS/1-6 IS PG if you're running Look Inside?? That's stupid. If you want to utilize a PG on offense with jump shots, then you switch to a Run n' Gun or a Princeton. The fact that everyone here keeps boasting a higher JS on a pure LI PG is just downright nonsense.

From: w_alloy

This Post:
00
229877.25 in reply to 229877.24
Date: 11/15/2012 8:47:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
But the ratio favors "Inside Shots" over jumpers. Why in the world would you want a 15+ JS/1-6 IS PG if you're running Look Inside?? That's stupid. If you want to utilize a PG on offense with jump shots, then you switch to a Run n' Gun or a Princeton. The fact that everyone here keeps boasting a higher JS on a pure LI PG is just downright nonsense.


If you had to trade off a bunch of other skills for the JS, it's not worth it. But JS is almost free salary wise on PGs. Guards will take jump shots in LI, and JS also boosts ability to hit inside shots (per a large analytical study). There's no reason not to have it.

You don't "need" JS on a LI PG. That doesn't mean more isn't better.

From: Texas

This Post:
00
229877.27 in reply to 229877.25
Date: 11/16/2012 7:20:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
I do agree with JS on a PG as long as it doesn't turn them into a SG. But I don't agree with the tradeoff with JS vs. IS when you favor JS on a LI PG. Does that clear up my stance?

An example on a salary efficient "LI PG" would be as follows:

14/9/16/14/16/15 - 13/10/4/4 - 10/10

That would be a sick LI PG I would love to have.

This Post:
11
229877.28 in reply to 229877.26
Date: 11/16/2012 7:26:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Great find Dr. J, although his OD and PA are kinda weak for my taste, especially on a LI PG.

EDIT: Checked on BuzzerManager and it looks like you could squeeze 3 OD pops or 3 PA pops in. He's at 95-100% of his potential already. That'll probably take an entire season though, so choose wisely.

Last edited by Texas at 11/16/2012 7:31:21 PM

From: w_alloy

This Post:
00
229877.29 in reply to 229877.27
Date: 11/16/2012 9:38:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Looks like we mostly agree then, I would also rather have IS than JS, and by a good margin. It's just JS is much more common and much cheaper on the TL.

Advertisement