BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > training!.. what lvl ttrainer?

training!.. what lvl ttrainer?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
267100.20 in reply to 267100.19
Date: 2/1/2015 8:49:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I think we're on the same page now. Based on the number the OP was willing to spend, I assumed he was going for an NT potential player: MVP for SF, HoF for G/Big.

The numbers I put up for the NT guard was meant to be a minimum; ideally, I'd like to see 15+ on JR and PA. I agree that we'd like to see more JR on all players. I slightly disagree your JS point. I do see it as a salary sink, but we have seen some statistical analysis tjat JS is more important for open 3's and 2 pt JS and JR is important for contested 3's. I'm willing to bet there is more to it than that (e.g. from streching the court), and this is just basic stats. I'm not willing to advocate less than 15 JS on a guard other than a pure LI PG (from a NT/NBBA perspective), but L'd love to see how a 16/16 SG performs.

<soapbox> imo, the reason for LI dominance is still structural. There is only one skill (OD) that defends 4 skills (JS, JR, HA, PA) and 2 skills that defend 2 others (ID/SB v. DR & IS) I assume RB defends itself. The recent changes help, but I still believe that OD is easily the most important skill and will keep outside teams in check at the higher levels </soapbox>

This Post:
00
267100.22 in reply to 267100.14
Date: 2/2/2015 5:31:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
My allstar guy is at 105 skills currently, at 24y,

10/10
12/12
12/9
12/10
9/9

I always used a level 3 coach, and this trainee had random starting skills.

I believe a good starting skillset is the key to training lower level potential player.

Maybe a superstar with good starting skills can be trained with level 3-4 coach.

MVP with good starting skills would be more expensive though, but could probably be trained with a 4-5 level trainer. Maybe get level 5 in first seasons, when training is faster, then switch to level 4 later. That would save tons of total training expenditures.

Anyway, my point is that I would rather spend more cash for a trainee with better starting skills, than hire expensive coaches over 8-10 seasons.

This Post:
00
267100.28 in reply to 267100.23
Date: 2/3/2015 4:56:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
My trainee was a random draftee, I got him in the first season, I checked starting skills at buzzer-manager. Looks like he had 49 skills

5/6
3/7
6/2
6/2
6/6

If he had 60, he would be at 116 skills already, with 4-5 training seasons left. And more, had a used a level 4-5 coaches.

Basically, what I'm saying is, that starting skills are way underrated. It's much more profitable to buy a better skilled trainee, than to buy a cheaper trainee, and then pay outrageous money for 10 seasons of trainers, to make up for the difference.

My other trainee was also a random draftee(no scouting), a year younger, also allstar pot, has 98 skills curently

11/9
12/11
11/9
10/12
5/8

Basically zero investment, and I never bothered about missing minutes or injuries.


Advertisement