BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Draft level

Draft level

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
55804.19 in reply to 55804.18
Date: 11/1/2008 8:49:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
we are saying simeler things but not quite i think that 19yo shooed have slightly batter skills then an 18 years old not bay much but for some that all

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
This Post:
00
55804.20 in reply to 55804.16
Date: 11/1/2008 8:59:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I don't ask for dramatic changes.. and any change here will be blessed than the current system.. I don't know what will happen more 2-3 season but right now the rookies level and the system, not usefulness for I.1 teams. and maybe I don't explained me as well but I'm just offered to makes it logical.. and it is not so sense why the game so improving every season and the draft level isn't.. because there wasn't any changes from the first draft at season 2 and until now .

This Post:
00
55804.21 in reply to 55804.20
Date: 11/1/2008 9:56:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I think this is a poor suggestion. young players today are no better relatively than the young players from 20 years ago. Draft candidates haven't gotten better in relation to the players in the league already, while players in the league continue to improve due to the better training and improved competition (and the fact that if they don't they will soon be out of a well-paid job).


Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
55804.22 in reply to 55804.21
Date: 11/2/2008 1:25:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
This is not the only suggestion, the difference between 18y-19y ..
Anyway, you too not caught the suggestion.. the idea it's not to make all the 19years old better than 18y, even if they not .. but if we taking the best potential at age 18 and the best potential at age 19, the 19 years old player should be more ready and prepared by his skills after "more year in the college" .

However, 19-18 or not, there are musts be some changes in the draft system .

Last edited by Warrior at 11/2/2008 1:28:24 AM

This Post:
00
55804.23 in reply to 55804.22
Date: 11/2/2008 2:54:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I don't think that the more year in college will prepare any player adequate or better than more year in the league..
It is his choice to lose a year, maybe there would be risk that noone would train him so he lose some of his potential for better chance for a play, good for him, however useless for you, because you are raising NT-capable players only, right?

Last edited by Iordanou at 11/2/2008 2:56:06 AM

This Post:
00
55804.25 in reply to 55804.24
Date: 11/2/2008 3:24:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Players have only 1 chance and everyone drafted then, depends on their's skills if they will be good investment for the training and I can imagine that one tall center still cannot rebound (2) and defend inside (2) at all.. so what about him even if he is 18y..

This Post:
00
55804.26 in reply to 55804.24
Date: 11/2/2008 3:57:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Helloooo peopleee wakeee upp this is VIRTUAL GAME, not human players!! they don't choose when to drafted and if lose a year or no !

but if we stick the reality, player who choose to stay more year in college/euroleague/anywhere, will get more expereince and if he so good and talented, he will imrpove and learn so much in that year .. if he is carpenter, he will stay carpenter, but still will learn some things and earn little experience .

Last edited by Warrior at 11/2/2008 4:04:20 AM

This Post:
00
55804.27 in reply to 55804.10
Date: 11/2/2008 4:50:09 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
we talking in generality, takes the best 18y and the best 19y player, they are in the same level. do you find it logical..?


we could imagine the best 19y players were drafted the season before when they were 18 ;)

From: Doctor J

This Post:
00
55804.28 in reply to 55804.11
Date: 11/2/2008 6:10:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
i agree the drat right now is not nearly optimal...i think you should give olders an advantage on youngers and rise the averages of the rookies higher,there's a whole diffrence from 1 draft pick and the last but if this game want to be like the real life then the first draft pick should be good enugh to play in the first 5 in his team in the NBA 1 draft picks are scoring 20 points in game most of the time and sometimes more but here you will be lucky if your new player will make a 10 poitns average...there is a lot to change in the current system for my opinion.

This Post:
00
55804.29 in reply to 55804.28
Date: 11/2/2008 6:48:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
absolutely untrue. A few number 1 picks help their teams, a few are stars, and a lot ride the pine. This year's number 1 pick is not starting for the BUlls. Nor are the #3, 6, 7, 8, or 9 picks starting for their teams. J.R Giddens, the Celtics' first pick, will be lucky to see court time during blowouts.

Just because a player is a year older does not mean he should be better. And I disagree that draftees should have better skills than t three seasons ago.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement