BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
66
181900.190 in reply to 181900.188
Date: 7/7/2011 3:07:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
It is really funny (in a sad way) how any time someone wins using the 2-3 you credit the victory to something else, but every time a team loses using the 2-3 you blame the defense.

It couldn't have possibly been that his two inside players logged 53 minutes so their performance dropped in the OT, or that his team shot 29% from behind the arc.

Or maybe his $300k lower salary. Or his twice as many turnovers. Perhaps if he had played M2M he would have lost by sixteen in regulation.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
11
181900.191 in reply to 181900.188
Date: 7/7/2011 5:13:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(35705786)

50% in FG...

He lost due to the 2-3...


his opponent had nearly the same fg percentage, with man to man and he even don't get an rebounding boost. Without his SF fouling out, and this weakens the defense because he have no backup(alreadxy when he is in foul trouble) he nearly wins against an stronger opponent. I would say he had a tight game because of 2-3.

This Post:
00
181900.192 in reply to 181900.189
Date: 7/7/2011 5:30:27 AM
Venomous Scorpions
Bartar
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
(25706998)

i think that out side offense is better than inside offense ...

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
181900.194 in reply to 181900.193
Date: 7/7/2011 10:30:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
That game is from last year ;)

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
181900.196 in reply to 181900.193
Date: 7/7/2011 10:40:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
did you even look at the player who play? The rating should made you already sceptical, before looking at their current roster.

But i would also consider a bit about sarcasm of the rating method from him here, when reading the post.

From: miqe

This Post:
00
181900.199 in reply to 181900.188
Date: 7/18/2011 11:27:18 AM
The Monty Python´s Flying Circus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
462462
not sure,

anyway
, wich is the diference in the A and AP role in a 2-3?,

no one, i think t e problem with 2-3 is how you use it, and both players A and AP should have big ID and good OD aswell, most teams who use 2-3 in real life uses big A in the A and AP position, any defence works ok with good players, ,not sure the tactic needs any reform but explore who it really works,

thats my opinion


From: Marot
This Post:
00
181900.200 in reply to 181900.199
Date: 7/19/2011 3:55:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
(36092998)

3-2 working better than 2-3. Also nice job on the rebound, even if Biznietos played at home lol ¡

Advertisement