BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Huzzel
This Post:
00
381.195 in reply to 381.194
Date: 12/17/2007 7:15:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
This Post:
00
381.197 in reply to 381.1
Date: 12/19/2007 9:01:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
hi - just a quick q.

has anyone worked out the difference between training 2 positions and 3 positions a week?

this week I have the potential to train 8-9 people if i go for a SF/PF/C routine vs 5 for just PF/SF... just trying to figure out is it worth it?

with any long term injury now meaning they would be out of the playoffs (if the doctors are as ineffective as many suggest) i would rather have a more balanced team....but

if the concensus is that it will dramatically reduce training speed/effectiveness i will continue with my 2 pronged approach..

also what ages are people still experiencing regular pops at... i wouldnt mind giving my 23 & 25 yo a couple of Skillups if still possible... again what are peoples thoughts?

cheers....

This Post:
00
381.198 in reply to 381.197
Date: 12/19/2007 7:30:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
It would be great if someone would test this long-term...

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
381.199 in reply to 381.198
Date: 12/19/2007 7:44:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
well this is the first week with transfers that i could stretch to 3 positions... i would be very reluctant to train team (unless stamina or free throw)

i would prefer to stick to 2 and would be prepared to switch to 1 position only if i do get my promised players into their respective NT and the managers insist on the fastest training only.....


This Post:
00
381.200 in reply to 381.199
Date: 12/20/2007 12:09:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
A little Q from me. Does the players have hidden talent ?

This Post:
00
381.201 in reply to 381.200
Date: 12/20/2007 12:19:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
If you believe me, I'd say they do have hidden factors. I had players who performed way better than players who had way better stats than the other one. I had this SG with respectable on first 6 stats. Shot 20% FG and 10% 3FG, based on 30 games with 28 min average. Then i had this SG with atrocious handling and mediocre JS, with the rest respectable, Shot 54% FG and 33% 3FG, based one 25 games.

It makes me just look at their Season average instead of their stats.

This Post:
00
381.202 in reply to 381.201
Date: 12/20/2007 2:07:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I wasn´t thinking about performance but about trainingspeed but maybee it´s linked together ?

This Post:
00
381.203 in reply to 381.202
Date: 12/20/2007 2:15:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Oh sorry, wasn't sure what you meant. Don't think they have a hidden factor training-wise. As for performance i do think there is one, like i stated in the previous post.

From what I've experienced, they tend to follow the chart WFU has setup. The chart seems solid.

This Post:
00
381.204 in reply to 381.201
Date: 12/20/2007 4:37:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
but the season stats are often misleading... esp as a lot of players play out of position for training purposes....

This Post:
00
381.205 in reply to 381.204
Date: 12/20/2007 6:38:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Season stats also fail to take into account the player's game shape, the type of offense played in the game, the strength of the opposing defender(s), and-- in the case of rebounds-- the type of defensive tactics used.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
Advertisement