BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Superstars vs. Depth

Superstars vs. Depth

Set priority
Show messages by
From: JohnnyB

This Post:
00
108278.3 in reply to 108278.2
Date: 9/6/2009 3:22:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
Well i have won CBBA with only 1 star, and a lots of very good players especially on my big men. An other good debate is a team with focus on 1 offensive tactic versus versatile teams. Ive chose the later 1 and it really helped me. They couldnt predict what tactic i would use on my next game, and especially on my last game my opponents D was disaster for him.

This Post:
00
108278.4 in reply to 108278.2
Date: 9/6/2009 6:27:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
I think indeed a depth team should win vs a superstar team. Subs are very important, and I guess having good subs can make you win games when the superstars get tired.

This Post:
00
108278.5 in reply to 108278.4
Date: 9/6/2009 3:12:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Proficient stamina superstar team is the toughest type to beat, just imo.

This Post:
00
108278.6 in reply to 108278.5
Date: 9/6/2009 3:27:49 PM
Nøtterøy Funkadelics
BLNO
Overall Posts Rated:
115115
Second Team:
Nøtterøy Funkadelics II
With sufficient stamina, those bench-players hardly get any minuts at all.

Superstars seems to be the way to go (not meaning salary-monsters, but versatile high-skilled players)

This Post:
00
108278.7 in reply to 108278.6
Date: 9/6/2009 5:05:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
In the long run of a season,the depth team will beat the supersar team.In the "win or die" game all is possible.But if the depth team in the season win,it have the home court advantage in the "win or die" game :D