BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Offensive rebounds

Offensive rebounds

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
19533.3 in reply to 19533.2
Date: 3/17/2008 9:43:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
As I understand it, 2-3 zone visibly increases the rebounding rating for the match. Which should increase both offensive and defensive rebounds.

I think it should NOT.
Why my offensive rebounding should be affected by my defensive tactic? I see it as an unjustified advantage for teams playing with 2-3 zone.

Last edited by Newton07 at 3/17/2008 9:44:25 AM

This Post:
00
19533.5 in reply to 19533.2
Date: 3/17/2008 10:00:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
As I understand it, 2-3 zone visibly increases the rebounding rating for the match. Which should increase both offensive and defensive rebounds.


This is correct, as far as I know.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
19533.6 in reply to 19533.5
Date: 3/17/2008 10:05:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
What's correct? That it works this way, or that it was intentionally designed to (i.e. it should) work this way?

This Post:
00
19533.7 in reply to 19533.6
Date: 3/17/2008 10:08:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I assume both.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
19533.8 in reply to 19533.7
Date: 3/17/2008 10:11:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
All right, well count me in with the camp that would call this a bug. A defensive tactic should affect defensive rebounding only.

This Post:
00
19533.9 in reply to 19533.8
Date: 3/17/2008 10:26:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I wouldn't call it a bug if it's designed that way intentionally.

A design flaw? Perhaps.

(I know it's probably semantics but there is a distinction)

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
19533.10 in reply to 19533.9
Date: 3/17/2008 10:32:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
If it is intentional, I'd suggest some clarity in the rules about the defensive tactic choice really being a defense+rebounding tactic.

But, really, I think it's a clear bug/flaw/mistake. Offensive tactics should have an impact on offensive rebounding, e.g. Run and Gun should have a negative OR impact. And this should be reflected in the description of offensive tactics in the rules.

This Post:
00
19533.12 in reply to 19533.11
Date: 3/17/2008 7:19:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
Thanks for the answer... clear, and complete. Always appreciated.

Advertisement