BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Do you understand DMI? (I don't...)

Do you understand DMI? (I don't...)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Koperboy

To: Coco
This Post:
00
219775.3 in reply to 219775.2
Date: 6/8/2012 4:05:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
DMI is intentionally designed to massively exaggerate the effect of game shape. So in general, equal DMI doesn't mean equal performance in any respect.


No, of course not. But since Player's A two skills at Prominent take bigger share of his DMI than rest of his skills, we can say that compared to Player B, Player's A relative skills look like this:

6, 6
8, 6
6, 8
6, 6
6, 6

This is an educated guess of course. But if it was true, I would probably pick Player B.

3) As for your last question: I find it to be completely dependent on the circumstances, opponents' tactics, tendendencies (e.g. what do they play at SF? more important to protect the perimeter or to protect the paint and rebound?)


To exclude those circumstances, let's say both teams are the same on PG, SG, PF and C spot with same GS, playing Base offense both. Opposing SF is Respectable on every skill.

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
219775.5 in reply to 219775.2
Date: 6/8/2012 8:28:39 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
2) on this basis I am tempted to say that player A would defend and pass better than player A, but do all other things worse. This is not one of your question, but I think it's about right.

I am tempted to say that player A would defend and pass equal to player A, and do all other things equal too.

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
219775.7 in reply to 219775.6
Date: 6/8/2012 11:53:13 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
that takes the fun out of typos.... (sad face)

Last edited by shikago at 6/8/2012 11:54:25 PM

This Post:
00
219775.8 in reply to 219775.1
Date: 6/9/2012 5:03:38 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
I guess in your specific example Player B could be *slightly* better. Since playing at SF & using base offense is a rare case where all skills might be equally important. (I need to give it some more thought first). There won't be that huge a difference in performance though. It' not going to win or lose a game for you.

But were your example about PG and playing look inside... Player A is looking like the better choice. Same for a similar example at center (replace PA & OD with Rebounding & ID)

No, of course not. But since Player's A two skills at Prominent take bigger share of his DMI than rest of his skills, we can say that compared to Player B, Player's A relative skills look like this:

6, 6
8, 6
6, 8
6, 6
6, 6

But player A's game shape isn't horrible (it's respectable), so it's more that player B would be getting a performance boost rather than player A getting a penalty. Perhaps player B now has all skills close to 8? While player A has has all 7s except the 10s in PA & OD.

From: CoachSK

This Post:
00
219775.9 in reply to 219775.8
Date: 6/10/2012 11:29:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
431431
But player A's game shape isn't horrible (it's respectable), so it's more that player B would be getting a performance boost rather than player A getting a penalty. Perhaps player B now has all skills close to 8? While player A has has all 7s except the 10s in PA & OD.

Agreed.

And If your playing Base Offense against Base Offense and these guys were SF's. I would go with Player B, because he will be the better all around player, which is needed for Base Offense.