BuzzerBeater Forums

Copy Pasted from the other thread that you had:

This has been suggested before and has been and always will be shot down very quickly. If multiple trainers were allowed then too many people would just train 6 players and create a monster team from nothing. One trainer is enough. If you want your bigs to get pops from training your guards, place them at the guard spot or train your full team (which isn't nearly as effective but then your bigs are also getting training).

I think the game is strategic enough at the moment especially with the addition of the Game Day Prep. Adding more things can be good, but also keep in mind that we want to welcome newer members to the game and have them at least understand most of the aspects of BB. If we continue to add to many things, only the managers that have played for a long time will stick around, because BB may be deemed as "too confusing".

its true that its unrealistic, but we would need to consider the long term impacts to the game.... the games economy, team structures and financial viability, the Overextension tax, merchanidising. these would all be affected by allowing multiple people to be trained during a week.

Why? Because instead of just having 1 or 2 guys get training per week, you end up with 4-5. or more! And then you end up with more players with better skills and bigger salaries, and... EVERYONE will have this. Therefore the transfer market will be flooded with more players who have better skills, this will cause massive transfer price fluctations. As a user, I will be training multiple guys who next season, ALL bump in salary, therefore i have to offload partially trained guys, this will again flood the market and cause massive transfer market issues.
More people will have access to more 'trained' personell, which means they can have a bigger Tax Exemption, which will counter-act the actual point of that change.

So yer im just giving you some examples of how even a change which brings the game to be more like 'reality' in fact could cause massive economic issues with the game.

I do however :) I do like the idea of the coach with sub-skills (or like a super-skill) in offense or defense minded training. That would be good.