BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Division Mixing season to season

Division Mixing season to season

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
268959.2 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 4/26/2015 11:43:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Maybe HCA in the finals could be decided by whichever team has the best record against the other conference.

This Post:
11
268959.4 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 4/30/2015 9:03:07 PM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
I like your idea ...

But I suggest that the mixing should be based on divisional overall ranking.

Message deleted
This Post:
11
268959.6 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 5/13/2015 12:07:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I agree but I think you should just swap, like for like, even or odd number teams (so 2nd red with 2nd blue, 4th red with 4th blue, 6th red with 6th blue).

This guarantees that if the 2 or 3 best teams in the league are in the same division at least one goes to the other side and the same applies to teams fighting to avoid relegation. It's been a few seasons in the English top league, that BOTH teams from the blue side won relegation series easily. Those teams which finished 5-7 in the blue side would have fought for a playoff spot in the other conference.

No change are needed to how rivals are determined: although instead of 2 games you should consider the single game you played the previous season for teams who are swapping conference

Last edited by Lemonshine at 5/13/2015 12:09:43 PM

This Post:
00
268959.7 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 5/14/2015 8:45:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
change your first sentnance
the idea of mixing the divisions season to season came to mind.

should be - mixing the conferences. Some of the reply's are people thinking its division mixing.

But yes. this is me since like season 19.
There have been only 3 division winners from the other conference since Season 19.

Here i am - stuck competing against a really hard conference season in season out. I remember one season, the other conference had the 3 relegates and the promotee, and the following season, i think we had no ABBL relegate, so that conference got 4 Div III promotees.

so i am definately all in favour for this idea. I personally think they could just randomize it every season. everyone in a big bucket, mix em up, where they lie, thats where it is.


This Post:
00
268959.8 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 5/15/2015 7:18:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I am in favor of this idea because I always get stuck in the hard side. But the only way to determine if the divisions are fair are through cross matchups.

This Post:
00
268959.9 in reply to 268959.1
Date: 5/16/2015 5:15:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353

Not much to say, great idea and I fully support this.

whether it's random or something like 1 with 3 and 2 with 4 etc, doesn't really matter to me either way, but I think it's a good idea for every 3-5 seasons or so.

This Post:
00
268959.10 in reply to 268959.9
Date: 5/17/2015 2:06:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Even though im fully supportive of this idea - im trying to think of disadvantages.

would there be a problem with Rival games? Or .... something else? i can't think of anything off the top of my head, maybe there is some reason why the conferences remain fixed?

anyone?

This Post:
00
268959.12 in reply to 268959.11
Date: 5/17/2015 4:25:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
whats long run? im waiting about 12 seasons now.

most of Div II's in Australia have been like this. People have actually 'tanked' deliberately to change conferences.


Advertisement