BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > the coaching staff... please...

the coaching staff... please...

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
280377.2 in reply to 280377.1
Date: 6/27/2016 6:28:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Very good suggestion and arguments! I share this point of view and have nothing more to submit, just hope that things will be change

This Post:
00
280377.3 in reply to 280377.1
Date: 6/27/2016 3:15:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
Do you have, in your lives, exemples of people like our BB coaches who have a salary that increases each week? me no.


I agree with everything you say with exception to this part. As I can think of examples in our lives where this occurs.

Business owners.

That said, not all businesses only see an increase in customers, and profit. There will be weeks where it stays the same, or goes down. But Business owners does fit as an example of this.

And if you want to stretch a little. Stock Brokers too, as they'll make more and more as they get better at recognizing trends of when to buy and sell, plus as they make more $ they have more $ to re-invest.

This Post:
00
280377.5 in reply to 280377.1
Date: 6/28/2016 12:32:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
why their salaries are not fixed , or they are not only changing from one season to the next?


Short answer would be because a level 7 trainer with $30k salary would cost $25 million (probably more without the hoarding limit) as it would be a one off investment that would pay for itself over time. Just another incentive to tank.

This Post:
00
280377.7 in reply to 280377.6
Date: 6/28/2016 5:52:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
Relevance? Where the staff comes from and the impact they have on the economy doesn't really make a difference. The OP is wondering why salary for staff increases, not why players don't become trainers/coaches.

This Post:
00
280377.9 in reply to 280377.8
Date: 6/28/2016 2:59:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
So instead of fighting to buy a trainer through high bid a process to home grow, as with players, that might take time and energy but perhaps be less expensive.


There is still the problem of lifespan. By the time your cheap investment shows a return, you would still only have the same amount of time until he is overpriced in salary. You wouldn't have time to redevelop another trainer as you still have trainees that require a certain level.

This Post:
00
280377.11 in reply to 280377.10
Date: 6/28/2016 8:41:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
The easiest way to introduce new staff is to create more staff. For seasons now that idea has been rejected (probably to remove money from the economy), so I doubt they will go for a more complicated system to "hopefully" create the same outcome.

The current staff system is only flawed in that it is susceptible to inflation. It still works in the way it was intended. It just costs way too much to purchase anything of real value, just like the transfer market.

Advertisement