BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Historical Team Ranking

Historical Team Ranking

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Siwy

This Post:
00
292799.2 in reply to 292799.1
Date: 3/20/2018 12:25:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
15061506
Far as I guess, there's given hierarchy in leaderboards of titles, with importance of title being considered at first, than number of highest titles, then number of second highest titles, and so on.
1) B3 championships
2) B3 runner-ups
3) league championships
4) league runner-ups
5) cup championships
6) cup runner-ups

Adding lower division titles and semifinalists to ranking would be hard, as this data isn't put in one place, as B3/national championship/cup winners.

Leniwy, stary, wyliniały kocur. Czasem jeszcze zerknie na polskie tłumaczenia.
From: Lemonshine

To: Siwy
This Post:
00
292799.3 in reply to 292799.2
Date: 3/20/2018 3:25:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Yes I agree B3 counts a lot more, but I was talking about the National page and I don't think B3 titles make sense there as onky 1 or 2 teams get to participate based on previous season results.

Making international comparisons is an exercise in futility, as winning titles and the B3 in larger nations is harder as you have much stroger league competition.