Furthermore, I would think about the assignment of the points of an achieved recognition.
At the present time the four "rarest" awards (as a category) give 340 points while all the other 18 (categories) give 274 points.
This is because the scores (all but one) are given based on how many users have reached that particular achievement; and they also change over time.
But this is very unbalancing, it would be more appropriate to give a standard score to the various achievements, to make the "competition" more open.
Of those four achievements that give the most points of all:
- one is practically impossible at the present time (sale of a player for $ 10,000,000)
- another is given by the purchase of the supporter (for himself and for other users) (and it is the only one that has a fixed and not decreasing value for the number of users who have reached it)
- the last two (231 points alone) concern forums and federations that have been languishing as the game languishes from the constant decrease of users for years
In my opinion, the system should be balanced a little.