BuzzerBeater Forums

I would like to ask if there is any player "under cap" already and his skills, thanks

The potential system is half a season old. Too soon for examination results. :-)

i think the "all-star" has a cap on stats of around 90 (if atrocious = 1 and so on...) sum up the players and im guessing the cap is near 90.

thats very anecdotal though

are you sure of this?

cause if its is its imp[ossoble to make all around players with high level of skills un;less his mvp and such stuff

I don't think it works like that. The BBs have said that the cap is similar to a salary cap. That means that you would be able to train multi-skilled players more.

i think the "all-star" has a cap on stats of around 90 (if atrocious = 1 and so on...) sum up the players and im guessing the cap is near 90.

thats very anecdotal though

Is the cap on total skill levels or on each skill individually?


Steve
Bruins

But salary isn't based on the total of all the skills (at least not linearly). It has much more to do with the max skill doesn't it?

Steve

i think having a balance skill level salary doesnt affect salary increase that much than having a skill or 2 with sensational or marvelous but other else got respectable or strong

yes i agree with you

=================================================================

but i dont think it could be this way for lets say a all star potential guy? is it really this way to sum his growth that if he reaches it then it a long climb after?

meaning a player would be like shaq, who though is a great inside player but is as dumb as a one who cant pass a exam in free throws?

as much as i think, for some guys training is a way to improve but i think the lakers even as saying it hiring ft shooting coaches for shaq really didnt see much improvement. why. . . . they baby'd him because his a star.

as much as ego is concern i think shaq is a knuckle head. i think the lakers just gave up on him. because as much as i know the nba does this, developing a player on a year or 2 if he doesnt show mastery or imprvement the way they want it either trade him or use him the way he can be utilize.

this is a player or a personal matter to accept training, but i think having this to consider seems to tough because right now we got to have an idea what kind of player can be develop into ?

i thought that the overall issue was if a bench warmer can develop skills fast till respectable then it is, right now im understanding if he reaches the soft cap number then it starts there.

so no matter what skills you develop lets say you build on lets say a bench warmer due to the soft cap just to develop one skill to have sensational for example is rebounding skills but other skills could just end up as average or lower or even atricious?

i mean yes he can still be trained even reaching his soft cap, but whatim saying is his potential to reach what he can be in a short period of time.

wow! this is getting interesting

IIRC, BB-Charles said that the sum of skills is qualitatively correct, which indicates that it is not on each individual skill, but suggests that is on some overall measure of skill - but not a simple sum at least.