BuzzerBeater Forums

What might be preferable would be for the game engine to take into account the effect of excessive fouls on how aggressively a player plays. There could be a reduction in shot blocking, ID, rebounding, and driving, such that the GE would treat an excessive number of fouls similar to how it treats tiredness.

This would mean that the substitution would be made based on the relative effectiveness of the substitute considering the foul trouble of the starter. As a secondary benefit, it could mean that when the starter and backup both have 3 fouls, that the starter might be brought back in, rather than going to a reserve.

Similarly, if a starter or backup were injured, the other player would be expected to play even if in foul trouble.

Alternatively, it could be a tactical setting on when to take a player out. For example, it could be assumed that a player will play in the last 6 minutes with 5 fouls. Then there could be a setting in minutes per foul.

( minutes_left - end_game) / (5 - PF) < minutes_per_foul

or re-arranging to avoid division by zero.

minutes_left < (5-PF) * minutes_per_foul + end_game

Assuming that end_game = 6, then if minutes_per_foul were 10

Player with 5 fouls could play last 6 minutes,
with 4 fouls could play last 16 minutes
with 3 fouls could play last 26 minutes
with 2 fouls could play last 36 minutes
with 1 foul could play last 46 minutes

The current GE is more like minutes_per_foul were 7 or 8

Also, it would really be fair for hidden physicality ratings to be revealed. It's a very important trait, and I'm sure not everyone knows about it.

In HT player characteristics def have a bearing for when I'm looking at players to add/sell.

Physicality is certainly an important aspect for a scorer. I look at the fouls/game average and #FTs attempted as my proxies.

I think that a starter with 3 fouls must re enter with the beginning of the third quarter. After all he has done half of the fouls he can do and he has played half of the game.
So I think he must be with the starters again after the half time.
If he makes his fourth foul too soon, then he might be benched for the rest of the third quarter and come back again in the beginning of the fourth period.
That's my opinion, I hope you'll agree with me.

whoah! your telling me there is a secret characteristic for every player in bb world?

this is getting interetsing?

even with 3 fouls, i think the game engine adjust doesnt mean totally he would play th the third or what.

sometimes he even inserts them again either for substitution of tired players or he cant bare the fact of getting run off by a big lead.

because even if you insert him again in the third or fouth but your already down with 20 points its going to be harder to catch up and applying more pressure on the defensive end will likely cause more fouls than none at all.

OK, let me rephrase my original question (and this is for everyone, not just Charles):

At what point in time would you consider a player with 3 fouls to have transitioned from being in "foul trouble" to not? (Perhaps it's not implemented as just a switch, but as a continuous factor, though.) In my experience watching BB games, the current transition happens somewhere around mid-third-quarter.

I've been avoiding putting my own opinion on it, although you can probably guess that I think it should be earlier than mid-third-quarter.

Edit: P.S. Thanks for the info on the defensive adjustments when in foul trouble.

Last edited by Mod-oeuftete at 8/1/2008 1:08:53 PM

But if a player made 2 fouls in Q1, and gets back on the court without making 1 foul in Q2, will the negative effect on D be downgraded/lifted in Q3?

But if a player made 2 fouls in Q1, and gets back on the court without making 1 foul in Q2, will the negative effect on D be downgraded/lifted in Q3?

I would assume so, why wouldn't it?